I agree with Gromit and with Jim Swire. Mr Magrahi always seemed a little too convenient a perpetrator, given that there was such a long gap between the event and his eventual conviction, during which time Libya was 'out in the cold'. I've always held the belief that their refusal to 'give up' someone for the crime was because they didn't actually have anyone to give up. Then , suddenly, surpise, surprise, Ghadaffi's no longer persona non grata with the western world and there's a convenient scapegoat. I've always suspected that there were massive covert machinations behind the scenes, as well as those overt ones that were televised and reported on at the time. After all, we and the Americans were baying for blood and for someone to atone for the crime and it didn't really matter who we got, as long as someone was prepared to take the fall for it. I wondered at the time what sort of deal Mr Magrahi did with both our and his government and what he personally got out of it. Why else would you let yourself be put in the frame?