Film, Media & TV0 min ago
Hung Parliament - Tory/Lib pact with Cable as Chancellor.
Apparently that is a prospect if we get into that situation.
I have been very impressed with Cable and not at all impressed with Osborne, so I am liking the idea.
What do our resident Tories think, could you share power with the Liberals, and would a Liberal as Chancellor work?
http://www.dailymail....t-Treasury-talks.html
I have been very impressed with Cable and not at all impressed with Osborne, so I am liking the idea.
What do our resident Tories think, could you share power with the Liberals, and would a Liberal as Chancellor work?
http://www.dailymail....t-Treasury-talks.html
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Gromit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.he's been talking to the Treasury too
http://www.guardian.c...cable-hung-parliament
The implication is that he might get to be chancellor in a Lib-Lab pact too. He does seem to have more nous than Osborne. Darling seems to be competent enough; his big problem is Brown, and I suppose Cable's would be too if he was in a pact with Labour, but presumably Brown couldn't fire him without bringing down the pact and the government.
http://www.guardian.c...cable-hung-parliament
The implication is that he might get to be chancellor in a Lib-Lab pact too. He does seem to have more nous than Osborne. Darling seems to be competent enough; his big problem is Brown, and I suppose Cable's would be too if he was in a pact with Labour, but presumably Brown couldn't fire him without bringing down the pact and the government.
I can not take the Liberals seriously. They are living in a world of compromise and fudge.
Their belief that a hung parliament would give them power is a fantasy. As for a Liberal Chancellor neither of the main parties would give such a powerful post to any minority party. They would rather call another election later in the year than allow that to happen. I agree with the Chairman of our local Labour party who said that he would rather have the Tories in power than share power with minority groups.
Their belief that a hung parliament would give them power is a fantasy. As for a Liberal Chancellor neither of the main parties would give such a powerful post to any minority party. They would rather call another election later in the year than allow that to happen. I agree with the Chairman of our local Labour party who said that he would rather have the Tories in power than share power with minority groups.
I'm very unimpressed with party politics, and the price for getting Vince as potential chancellor would probably be a change in the voting system to seal the concept of political parties into the process even more than it already is. Undemocratic, far too high a price to pay.
I'll only support the hung parliament when I see the scaffold being built.
I'll only support the hung parliament when I see the scaffold being built.
It is an intersting thought, however I see a couple of problems.
1) I could not see any leader, Brown or Cameron being held to ransom
2) By far the biggest problem would be the perception of the markets. GB is in a bit of a precarious position at the moment particularly around our credit rating and standing in the world. I am not sure the markets would see this as a good thing.
1) I could not see any leader, Brown or Cameron being held to ransom
2) By far the biggest problem would be the perception of the markets. GB is in a bit of a precarious position at the moment particularly around our credit rating and standing in the world. I am not sure the markets would see this as a good thing.
(If we can all grow up and stop the silly slagging)
One of the problems with hung parliaments is the fact that we don't have fixed term parliaments.
It's too easy for a coalition to form and mess about for a few months unitil someone fancies their chances of getting a majority and then pulling out and forcing another general election in 6 months.
But I think Liberal economic policy is much closer to Labour than Tory. Add that to the fact that a minority Labour administration would be more dependant on Liberal support than a Tory one (who I think would engineer another election quickly) and you see that a Lib/Lab pact is likely to be more attractive to Clegg than a Lib/Tory one.
Personally I think that if Cameron wants to see the inside of number 10 he has to win outright.
That's a fair ask when you remember that he is starting from a smaller base than Michael Foot had!
One of the problems with hung parliaments is the fact that we don't have fixed term parliaments.
It's too easy for a coalition to form and mess about for a few months unitil someone fancies their chances of getting a majority and then pulling out and forcing another general election in 6 months.
But I think Liberal economic policy is much closer to Labour than Tory. Add that to the fact that a minority Labour administration would be more dependant on Liberal support than a Tory one (who I think would engineer another election quickly) and you see that a Lib/Lab pact is likely to be more attractive to Clegg than a Lib/Tory one.
Personally I think that if Cameron wants to see the inside of number 10 he has to win outright.
That's a fair ask when you remember that he is starting from a smaller base than Michael Foot had!
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.