ChatterBank16 mins ago
Will there be a U-Turn on the wearing of the Burkha & Nigab?
28 Answers
Not as we in this country have a 'cat in hells chance' of ever getting the Burkha or the Nigab
banned in Britain, but it will be interesting next month when Strasbourg issues their directive.
/// The human rights watchdog, based in Strasbourg, announced it will issue a directive next month that will be binding on all 47 European nations, including the UK.///
Will France, Belgium, and maybe later the Netherlands be forced to make a U-Turn?.
banned in Britain, but it will be interesting next month when Strasbourg issues their directive.
/// The human rights watchdog, based in Strasbourg, announced it will issue a directive next month that will be binding on all 47 European nations, including the UK.///
Will France, Belgium, and maybe later the Netherlands be forced to make a U-Turn?.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I hope they're banned.
//The Muslim Council of Britain condemned it, saying: “The French government should be upholding religious freedoms.”//
Firstly, why should they be expected to uphold irrational beliefs taught by a 1500 year old book, and secondly, whose freedoms are they talking about? Certainly not the freedoms of the women who are indoctrinated from childhood to believe that unless they shroud themselves from society they will be raped - or worse.
//The Muslim Council of Britain condemned it, saying: “The French government should be upholding religious freedoms.”//
Firstly, why should they be expected to uphold irrational beliefs taught by a 1500 year old book, and secondly, whose freedoms are they talking about? Certainly not the freedoms of the women who are indoctrinated from childhood to believe that unless they shroud themselves from society they will be raped - or worse.
#//The Muslim Council of Britain condemned it, saying: “The French government should be upholding religious freedoms.”//
The Muslim Council are wromg , wearing the Burkha or the veil is not in the Koran or the Haddith. It is a culturing thing imposed by extremists. In fact only applied in a minority of Muslim states. It's like women not being allowed to drive in Saudi Arabia. The fact is women have less freedom today than in the days of the prophet.
The Muslim Council are wromg , wearing the Burkha or the veil is not in the Koran or the Haddith. It is a culturing thing imposed by extremists. In fact only applied in a minority of Muslim states. It's like women not being allowed to drive in Saudi Arabia. The fact is women have less freedom today than in the days of the prophet.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
Quinlad, if you see concerns over security and women's rights as 'hatred', I suggest you see a doctor about that squint. It's seriously clouding your vision.
Ratter, I wonder how long it would be before the men got tired of going to work, shopping for groceries, taking the kids to school, and running round daily to make sure grandma's ok? Maybe this would help to change their ideas. Just a thought.
Ratter, I wonder how long it would be before the men got tired of going to work, shopping for groceries, taking the kids to school, and running round daily to make sure grandma's ok? Maybe this would help to change their ideas. Just a thought.
As has often been pointed out, the Burkha/Niqab are Arabic, not Islamic. Remember that while most Arabs are Muslim, most Muslims aren't Arabs (they're Asian).
I have to admit, I don't actually know if it's some kind of oppressive garment (largely because I find the issue a bit dull) but I instinctively distrust the sensationalist claims that it is purely because it seems that 9 times out of 10 such claims are wildly exaggerated.
Doesn't anyone else find the banning of clothes a bit strange? It just seems so... I don't know... petty to me. State power is generally something we should consider very carefully before using, and it never really seems like it is in this case. A bit like that stupid minaret ban.
I have to admit, I don't actually know if it's some kind of oppressive garment (largely because I find the issue a bit dull) but I instinctively distrust the sensationalist claims that it is purely because it seems that 9 times out of 10 such claims are wildly exaggerated.
Doesn't anyone else find the banning of clothes a bit strange? It just seems so... I don't know... petty to me. State power is generally something we should consider very carefully before using, and it never really seems like it is in this case. A bit like that stupid minaret ban.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.