Quizzes & Puzzles1 min ago
Appeasing terrorists again?
http://news.bbc.co.uk...rmingham/10337961.stm
Cameras for good or bad do assists crime so why must we make exceptions for the terrorist breeding heartlands? 200 to be covered in case they cause "offence"! Get some back bone Birmigham!
Cameras for good or bad do assists crime so why must we make exceptions for the terrorist breeding heartlands? 200 to be covered in case they cause "offence"! Get some back bone Birmigham!
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by R1Geezer. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Backdrifter
/// What about the small number of convicted middle-aged white male paedophiles and child murderers - should we therefore keep all middle-aged white men under constant surveillance? By your argument, we should. ///
For your information, in the present age we live in all males whatever age, or of whatever colour, are under constant surveillance.
Would any lone male now approach a seemingly lost child, have a camera on display anywhere near where children are, or smile and dare to speak to a child in the presence of some mothers?
/// What about the small number of convicted middle-aged white male paedophiles and child murderers - should we therefore keep all middle-aged white men under constant surveillance? By your argument, we should. ///
For your information, in the present age we live in all males whatever age, or of whatever colour, are under constant surveillance.
Would any lone male now approach a seemingly lost child, have a camera on display anywhere near where children are, or smile and dare to speak to a child in the presence of some mothers?
Backdrifter.....paedophiles and child murderers cannot be compared to islamic terrorists
Back to the subject of the OP.......nothing to hide = no reason to object to the cameras
The bleeding hearts brigade triumphs over national security
One thinks you would be singing a different tune if one of your relatives or friends had been a victim of the 7/7 atacks
Back to the subject of the OP.......nothing to hide = no reason to object to the cameras
The bleeding hearts brigade triumphs over national security
One thinks you would be singing a different tune if one of your relatives or friends had been a victim of the 7/7 atacks
joeluke, I can honestly say all of your posts I've seen are tragic. You have a truly one-dimensional brain. It's as though you've inhaled every Daily Mail cliche there ever was, and are just spewing them out, one by one. You're a walking embodiment of the fact that the biggest threat to our country is our own stupidity, not terrorists.
backdrifter
Sorry to disappoint you but I never read the Daily Mail
So all of my posts are 'tragic' are they?
Not quite as tragic as having a fetish for odd looking ginger women though eh?
http://www.theanswerb...y/Question572779.html
Time for you to wake up and smell the coffee, and when the next terrorist attack in this country is carried out by seemingly 'ordinary' people who live anonymously within their own community perhaps you'll think that surveilance cameras in said community would have been a good idea after all
Sorry to disappoint you but I never read the Daily Mail
So all of my posts are 'tragic' are they?
Not quite as tragic as having a fetish for odd looking ginger women though eh?
http://www.theanswerb...y/Question572779.html
Time for you to wake up and smell the coffee, and when the next terrorist attack in this country is carried out by seemingly 'ordinary' people who live anonymously within their own community perhaps you'll think that surveilance cameras in said community would have been a good idea after all
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.