Quizzes & Puzzles1 min ago
Jermy Hunt tells the truth and it's toys out the pram again..
http://news.bbc.co.uk...rseyside/10434714.stm
20000+ drunk ticketless scousers force their way into a football match and cause death, I'd say he's absolutely correct. Why are the Hillsborough sympathisers so unable to accept the basic truth? Yes Plod made errors but it wouldn't have been an issue if not for all those ticketless hooligans.
20000+ drunk ticketless scousers force their way into a football match and cause death, I'd say he's absolutely correct. Why are the Hillsborough sympathisers so unable to accept the basic truth? Yes Plod made errors but it wouldn't have been an issue if not for all those ticketless hooligans.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by R1Geezer. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Geezer
Having read the following 2 books I suggest you do the same. It will stop you posting cr@p you know nothing about in future
http://www.amazon.co....Scraton/dp/1840181567
http://www.amazon.co....-Taylor/dp/0853231990
(Other book distributors are available)
Having read the following 2 books I suggest you do the same. It will stop you posting cr@p you know nothing about in future
http://www.amazon.co....Scraton/dp/1840181567
http://www.amazon.co....-Taylor/dp/0853231990
(Other book distributors are available)
Shall I type this slowly for you ?
There is NO evidence that *Hooliganism* (see joelukes definition, and my many examples for clarification) contributed to the tragedy at Hillsborough.
It is as if JH mentioned Heysel and Bradford (1985) as examples of *hooliganism*. One certainly was...............and one wasn't. He was wrong and that hole you are digging, whilst getting deeper, is surely getting narrower for you ?
There is NO evidence that *Hooliganism* (see joelukes definition, and my many examples for clarification) contributed to the tragedy at Hillsborough.
It is as if JH mentioned Heysel and Bradford (1985) as examples of *hooliganism*. One certainly was...............and one wasn't. He was wrong and that hole you are digging, whilst getting deeper, is surely getting narrower for you ?
Somehow I doubt you have or are capable of learning anything about anything you disagree with Geezer.
I and others have blown two rather large gaping holes in your question but it does not seem to bother you at all.
Why are the Hillsborough sympathisers so unable to accept the basic truth?
you posted 2 untruths in your opening post.
I and others have blown two rather large gaping holes in your question but it does not seem to bother you at all.
Why are the Hillsborough sympathisers so unable to accept the basic truth?
you posted 2 untruths in your opening post.
11:43 on Tue 29/Jun/10)
Obviously the books are just a tad more accurate than a cobbled together tv news report a mere 3 hours after the disaster took place
Which is where you took your estimated 20,000+ figure from
joeluke
_____________________
No joe it is where he has said he got it from, personally i think he made that up to.
Obviously the books are just a tad more accurate than a cobbled together tv news report a mere 3 hours after the disaster took place
Which is where you took your estimated 20,000+ figure from
joeluke
_____________________
No joe it is where he has said he got it from, personally i think he made that up to.
did fans/hooligans/trespassers without tickets force their way in? if the answer to that is yes then they are partially to blame. Yes pick holes in the question if you like but really most of you have been playing semantics and shouting at me rather than actually attempting to undertstand. Inquests are generally set up to get the answers that those setting them up want. QED the David Kelly inquest.
-- answer removed --
// did fans/hooligans/trespassers without tickets force their way in? //
No they didn't. The turnstiles were not coping with the amount of people (with tickets) trying to get in and requests to get the game delayed were ignored. As kick off approached, and fearing they would miss the start of the match, the fans became more anxious to get in on time, and a crush developed.
That was when the Police made the fateful and clearly wrong decision to open the gates to the pens behind the goals. Ticketless fans did not force their way in, as the gates were wide open. Opening the gates and letting the ticketless fans in, caused the tragedy.
No they didn't. The turnstiles were not coping with the amount of people (with tickets) trying to get in and requests to get the game delayed were ignored. As kick off approached, and fearing they would miss the start of the match, the fans became more anxious to get in on time, and a crush developed.
That was when the Police made the fateful and clearly wrong decision to open the gates to the pens behind the goals. Ticketless fans did not force their way in, as the gates were wide open. Opening the gates and letting the ticketless fans in, caused the tragedy.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.