Okay , a pension of £215,000 a year is a huge pension, but I expext he contributed to it and the benefit was part of the package offered to attract the best candidate.
Would you object if ITV pays the same or more? if not, are you suggesting the BBC should not try to compete for the best staff?
All these packages pale into insignificance compared with top footballers who earn over £5 million a year and get multi million pound signing on fees too.
Having said that, I think there is network of people with a vested interest in inflating salaries in certain job markets. I also agree it's time someone had a 'root and branch' review of how the BBC spends our money. We may find though that the cost of consultants to investigate this matter will exceed any benefits and may make things worse if it highlights to BBC staff that they are paid less than ITV/Sky staff, leading to costs being pushed up not down.