ChatterBank1 min ago
Leaders attending disaster areas .
We often see leaders of countries criticised for not rushing to the scene of disasters.
The most recent being President Obama and the president of Pakistan. Is that fair criticism ?
There maybe diplomatic and phychological reasons but what is the practical value of their presence.?
I remember a senior aid officer saying a few years back that he hoped they kept away as it diverted hundreds of personnel and helicopters and transport away from the scene , which could be put to better use. He added " Frankly they just get in the way and don't know what they are talking about ".
The most recent being President Obama and the president of Pakistan. Is that fair criticism ?
There maybe diplomatic and phychological reasons but what is the practical value of their presence.?
I remember a senior aid officer saying a few years back that he hoped they kept away as it diverted hundreds of personnel and helicopters and transport away from the scene , which could be put to better use. He added " Frankly they just get in the way and don't know what they are talking about ".
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by modeller. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Each case has it's own set of circumstances, but as a rule they should go. It highlights the plight of the survivors and helps raise awareness and donations.
There was not much criticism of Obama, he rushed to the Gulf if Mexico pretty sharpish, aroutou thinking of Dubya who had to be dragged to New Orleans?
There is a difference when the Prime Minister scarpers to another country when his people need him most. That is very poor.
There was not much criticism of Obama, he rushed to the Gulf if Mexico pretty sharpish, aroutou thinking of Dubya who had to be dragged to New Orleans?
There is a difference when the Prime Minister scarpers to another country when his people need him most. That is very poor.
-- answer removed --
Which particular Prime Minister would Gromit be referring to?
If it's the Prime Minister of Pakistan, Yousaf Raza Gillani hasn't 'scarpered' anyway. He's working hard to find ways of dealing with his country's problems.
Meanwhile the President of Pakistan, Asif Ali Zardari, is concerning himself with more long-term issues, such as the fight against terrorism.
Which means that they're both carrying out their constitutional duties.
Chris
PS: I also think that it's completely pointless for any political leader to visit the scene of any disaster. In these days of electronic communications, anything that a political leader can do can be done from anywhere in the world but it might still be best if he simply stays in his own office, from where he has the quickest access to advisers who really know what's going on and, hopefully, also know how to deal with it.
If it's the Prime Minister of Pakistan, Yousaf Raza Gillani hasn't 'scarpered' anyway. He's working hard to find ways of dealing with his country's problems.
Meanwhile the President of Pakistan, Asif Ali Zardari, is concerning himself with more long-term issues, such as the fight against terrorism.
Which means that they're both carrying out their constitutional duties.
Chris
PS: I also think that it's completely pointless for any political leader to visit the scene of any disaster. In these days of electronic communications, anything that a political leader can do can be done from anywhere in the world but it might still be best if he simply stays in his own office, from where he has the quickest access to advisers who really know what's going on and, hopefully, also know how to deal with it.
-- answer removed --
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.