Crosswords9 mins ago
"Benefit Cleansing" in London. Boris & Dave disagree
// This morning the Mayor of London, Boris Johnson, has condemned planned cuts in housing benefit as leading to "Kosovo style social cleansing". He told the BBC that:
"You are not going to see, on my watch...thousands of families being evicted from the place where they've been living and where they have put down roots. That is not what Londoners want to see. It's not what we're going to accept." //
Are the Conservatives in disarray? Is Boris making a noise to save his Mayorship? We will see a U-Turn and the idea scrapped (in London)?
"You are not going to see, on my watch...thousands of families being evicted from the place where they've been living and where they have put down roots. That is not what Londoners want to see. It's not what we're going to accept." //
Are the Conservatives in disarray? Is Boris making a noise to save his Mayorship? We will see a U-Turn and the idea scrapped (in London)?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Gromit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.“Will councils in London reduce rents for tenants on benefits? If they don't where are they going to get people to occupy the vacated properties?”
Well Sandy, the rents for “council” properties (or more usually Housing Association properties) in London and elsewhere are set at between 20% and 30% of the market rate. As a result it is most unlikely that those tenants in receipt of Housing Benefit will be affected at all by this proposal. I cannot imagine there is a rented property in the “social housing” sector that has a rent anywhere near the limits proposed.
This proposal will affect those tenants in private properties who are currently claiming more than £20,000pa for a four bedroom house (lower limits will apply for other types of property). Many people not in receipt of benefits would love to live in London but, understandably, cannot afford the high rents involved. Instead they have to live elsewhere. It’s called “cutting your cloth”, and it seems that those in receipt of large sums in HB and who live in agreeable properties in the capital will have to learn to do just that.
Much as I like BoJo, I’m afraid this is no business of his as it is not the GLA that has to pay Housing Benefit from its budget.
Well Sandy, the rents for “council” properties (or more usually Housing Association properties) in London and elsewhere are set at between 20% and 30% of the market rate. As a result it is most unlikely that those tenants in receipt of Housing Benefit will be affected at all by this proposal. I cannot imagine there is a rented property in the “social housing” sector that has a rent anywhere near the limits proposed.
This proposal will affect those tenants in private properties who are currently claiming more than £20,000pa for a four bedroom house (lower limits will apply for other types of property). Many people not in receipt of benefits would love to live in London but, understandably, cannot afford the high rents involved. Instead they have to live elsewhere. It’s called “cutting your cloth”, and it seems that those in receipt of large sums in HB and who live in agreeable properties in the capital will have to learn to do just that.
Much as I like BoJo, I’m afraid this is no business of his as it is not the GLA that has to pay Housing Benefit from its budget.
I think Boris's agenda is, at its most basic, speaking out when London's 'specialness' isn't recognised and when blanket legislation doesn't accommodate London's unique characteristics.
This is his 'speaking up for London/Londoners' stance regardless of Party lines.
In actuality, benefits shouldn't be used to distort the market. If property is beyond people's means that's the way of the world.
A quite separate issue is the provision of affordable housing in central London for key (but relatively low paid) workers or a consistent policy of London-weighting.
.
This is his 'speaking up for London/Londoners' stance regardless of Party lines.
In actuality, benefits shouldn't be used to distort the market. If property is beyond people's means that's the way of the world.
A quite separate issue is the provision of affordable housing in central London for key (but relatively low paid) workers or a consistent policy of London-weighting.
.
craft <Thread: London Shopping Visit>
<^ The Montague on the Garden is lovely with a great restaurant >
You Traitor! You Quisling!
I hope you are now barred from every Hotel and Restaurant in York - that's right, the Indian one AND the Chinese.
Alexander - that's interesting - I never said the Far North wasn't used for experiments and tests. It's like the Russians testing atomic bombs in Siberia.
.
<^ The Montague on the Garden is lovely with a great restaurant >
You Traitor! You Quisling!
I hope you are now barred from every Hotel and Restaurant in York - that's right, the Indian one AND the Chinese.
Alexander - that's interesting - I never said the Far North wasn't used for experiments and tests. It's like the Russians testing atomic bombs in Siberia.
.
'A quite separate issue is the provision of affordable housing in central London for key (but relatively low paid) workers or a consistent policy of London-weighting. '
^^^^ Darn tooting!
Yours
China Doll
NHS Worker
Central London
(Although acutally, if you go to south east London, it's prettier and because there's no tubes, the rents are a bit more affordable in certain areas, so it's not all bad).
^^^^ Darn tooting!
Yours
China Doll
NHS Worker
Central London
(Although acutally, if you go to south east London, it's prettier and because there's no tubes, the rents are a bit more affordable in certain areas, so it's not all bad).
no castles in London, Zeuhl? What about the much loved Elephant and Castle? Now further enhanced by an iconic skyscraper
http://i.bnet.com/blo...london_tower_side.jpg
Boris's problem is that he was voted in by the wealthy suburbanites of outer London, not the turbulent Trots of the central city. If thousands of the latter are moved out to Bromley, his majority may be under threat.
http://i.bnet.com/blo...london_tower_side.jpg
Boris's problem is that he was voted in by the wealthy suburbanites of outer London, not the turbulent Trots of the central city. If thousands of the latter are moved out to Bromley, his majority may be under threat.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.