Offensive or not?

[anotheoldgit]

http://tinyurl.com/2wkvykj

Personally I cannot see anything offensive about these posters, at least they are tame in comparison to some of the images show on TV, both in commercials and pre-watershed programmes.

But this is from a males point of view, do you ladies find them denigrating towards women in any way?

[MickyMacgraw]

Neither is the middle extremely suggestive sexual positioning pose acceptable.
Sqad the tv's switched when sexual scenes come on the tv and kids watch sex on the internet? You have to be talking about teenagers and not kids as in very young children.

[Bbbananas]

yup - sqad and vibra have, at last, contributed.
And there speaks the voice(s) of experience and good taste........

[Sqad]

Micky

<<<Sqad the tv's switched when sexual scenes come on the tv and kids watch sex on the internet<<<<

Yeah! right.

[LoftyLottie]

They are erotic rather than tacky in my opinion. But they are not suitable for advertising men's wear in a shopping centre and that makes me feel extremely uncomfortable.

[Sqad]

lofty....sex sells.

[jackthehat]

2 of them are cheesy and quite poorly styled...
The third of them is far beyond what should be acceptable as a 'general' advertisment in a shopping centre.

[MickyMacgraw]

Seriously sqad sex is quite graphic and a toddler or child has no business watching it in my opinion.

[Davethedog]

I don't think it should be on general view but in an adult situation nothing wrong.

I just had to go to thier web site and see if I was going to be further offended, and I was only for Doc and Vibra

http://www.suitsupply.nl/#/collection

I should also say I wonder how much the publicity would have cost, I had never heard of them before.

[LoftyLottie]

And yes Sqad little boys do look up girls skirts and are told off for doing so. It is unacceptable from little boys and much more so from adult men!! And yes it is is denigrating towards women.

[Count-A-Strong]

The second and third are a bit OTT and I feel the inclusion of the women actually detracts from what the ad's about. Having said that, it's certainly gotten the brand name recognised!

[Zeuhl]

<<sex sells>>

No one's going to get laid wearing these clothes.

They should be prosecuted under the Trades Descriptions Act
.

[DEN53]

So does it make you want to go and buy that god awful check suit then Sqad ?

[Sqad]

micky....I agree..........but the question is "do they get access to graphic sex" and in my opinion the answer is Yes.......and quite easily.

[Sqad]

Den....LOL.......it might have done in my twilight years;-)

[naomi24]

Tacky and crass.

[LoftyLottie]

LOL Vibes. No chance!!

[DEN53]

blimey Sqad - your dress sense is worse than I though...............(:0 (