News0 min ago
Radio Swore
Unfortunate slip of the tongue from James Naughtie on Radio Four this morning (do not listen if easily offended)
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Gromit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.piggynose
I know perfectly well what it means, and the fact that it is very offensive, especially to females.
But that was the whole point of my question, why?
Let's try and find the answer without any insults etc.
Let's start with the meaning, it's a slang word for part of a females anatomy, just as the 'P' word is the slang word for part of a male's anatomy.
I know I am leaving myself wide open to the less than polite brigade, who would love to call me both, but if they did, which one would I find the most offensive 'C' or 'P'?
To be honest, as a male I would not find any difference.
I know perfectly well what it means, and the fact that it is very offensive, especially to females.
But that was the whole point of my question, why?
Let's try and find the answer without any insults etc.
Let's start with the meaning, it's a slang word for part of a females anatomy, just as the 'P' word is the slang word for part of a male's anatomy.
I know I am leaving myself wide open to the less than polite brigade, who would love to call me both, but if they did, which one would I find the most offensive 'C' or 'P'?
To be honest, as a male I would not find any difference.
jackthehat
/// I think it has to with the meaning /// ???????
I think that deserves an answer on it's own.
/// the 'explosive' nature of the pronunciation; it sounds nasty.///
Well forgive me but I have tried to say both words under my breath, and I myself don't find one more 'explosive' than the other, and they both sound equally nasty.
Could it be that this is a throw-back from days gone by, when women were put on a pedestal much more than they are today, more's the shame.
Some of today's females can dish out just as many expletives than the most vulgar male, so should they really be shocked?
/// I think it has to with the meaning /// ???????
I think that deserves an answer on it's own.
/// the 'explosive' nature of the pronunciation; it sounds nasty.///
Well forgive me but I have tried to say both words under my breath, and I myself don't find one more 'explosive' than the other, and they both sound equally nasty.
Could it be that this is a throw-back from days gone by, when women were put on a pedestal much more than they are today, more's the shame.
Some of today's females can dish out just as many expletives than the most vulgar male, so should they really be shocked?
AOG
// and why you had to add (do not listen if easily offended) I do not know. //
No you wouldn't, it was out of courtesy to other ABers. I realise that some people are more offended by foul language than others. It does not offend me, but there was a possibility it could upset another user. There is no age restriction on AB, it can be viewed by children, so the precautionary warning was justified.
// and why you had to add (do not listen if easily offended) I do not know. //
No you wouldn't, it was out of courtesy to other ABers. I realise that some people are more offended by foul language than others. It does not offend me, but there was a possibility it could upset another user. There is no age restriction on AB, it can be viewed by children, so the precautionary warning was justified.
A little rich in my current appreciation of you Gromit, following your comment on the Concorde thread last night - which you were factually horrendously wrong. I would apprciate an apology (but do see the facts on the thread).. Also, I would appreciate your honesty if you pressed the report button, as if you did, this would have been wrong in view of the facts.
However, I do appreciate what you are laying out on this one......it was unfortunately a classic spoonerism and I understand, by chance, Andrew Marr fell foul of it as well. It will certainly not be the last time......
However, I do appreciate what you are laying out on this one......it was unfortunately a classic spoonerism and I understand, by chance, Andrew Marr fell foul of it as well. It will certainly not be the last time......