Crosswords1 min ago
GAZA
iwanted to feel sorry for paul thinking how the mighty have fallen,♥ but he was 4 times over the limit he could have killed some innocent person♥♥♥
Answers
He should have felt the full weight of the law for the DD offence. Perhaps he'll get sent down at next weeks hearing..... ........?
But only for breaking the laws that he actually broke not for what 'might' have happened !
The sooner he throws open his closet door the better he'll feel........ ....
But only for breaking the laws that he actually broke not for what 'might' have happened !
The sooner he throws open his closet door the better he'll feel........
17:15 Thu 09th Dec 2010
-- answer removed --
This guy (link below) NARROWLY escaped jail ,wasnt drunk but clipped the kerb with fatal consequences and Gazza escapes it :
http://www.thecourier...-prison-sentence.html
Makes you wonder......
http://www.thecourier...-prison-sentence.html
Makes you wonder......
if that was me on my bike ,bet i would go straight to jail
you get 6 months for just going over the speed limit
http://www.telegraph....-old-son-on-back.html
you get 6 months for just going over the speed limit
http://www.telegraph....-old-son-on-back.html
sorry, other thread:
http://www.theanswerb...k/Question966405.html
http://www.theanswerb...k/Question966405.html
No CAS -I know this but the point I was trying to make was this guy did no more than clip a kerb (we've all done it my alloys are testamount) -he didnt take charge of a vehicle under the influnce-it was an accident and someone was killed.Yet Gazza on the other hand couldnt have given a flying flump so i think he is the one who should be in jail and not the other guy who avoided it my the skin of his teeth -I dont think he should have been even considered for a custodial in the first place but thats a by the by.
Sorry Dr Filth -I didnt see your post -that is shocking and that man is a disgrace and he should have had a custodial.
Thats the problem -there are guidelines but its up to who is sentencing how they interpret them and thats is wriong IMO.They should be far more astringent.
We have a Sheriff in Perth (Wheatley) although think he's High Court now -who allegedly jailed drink drivers because he could and he allegedly always did...his daughter was killed by one :(
Thats the problem -there are guidelines but its up to who is sentencing how they interpret them and thats is wriong IMO.They should be far more astringent.
We have a Sheriff in Perth (Wheatley) although think he's High Court now -who allegedly jailed drink drivers because he could and he allegedly always did...his daughter was killed by one :(
"Gascoigne is also due to be tried on a separate charge of drinking and driving, which he denies.
He is accused of driving a Ford Transit van while more than four times the legal alcohol limit on 7 February at Leeming Bar, in North Yorkshire."
so what happens if hes found guilty of this one as well ?
He is accused of driving a Ford Transit van while more than four times the legal alcohol limit on 7 February at Leeming Bar, in North Yorkshire."
so what happens if hes found guilty of this one as well ?