Christmas In The Good Old Days
ChatterBank1 min ago
Jo Yeates murder suspect arrested.
Is there any inkling who this 32 year old suspect is? My immediate thought was it was a friend of the family who Jo phoned to come round for a drink. He said then that he could not come.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by rov1100. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Good grief!
After all the hooha of people slagging off and speculating about the last person arrested on suspicion, I would have hoped that people would be a little more capabale of waiting for real information this time.
Anyone seen the full page apology in the DM for the way they treated "Professor Strange"?
No, me neither...
After all the hooha of people slagging off and speculating about the last person arrested on suspicion, I would have hoped that people would be a little more capabale of waiting for real information this time.
Anyone seen the full page apology in the DM for the way they treated "Professor Strange"?
No, me neither...
I actually think that the landlord was right in that what he said about thinking he had seen Jo leaving with two people, was exaggerated. He never made claims that he was right in his assumption. Because he is eccentric looking people were all too ready to believe he was the culprit. He is still under suspicion by the way.
I just wish people would just stop trying to play detective without knowing any facts.
I just wish people would just stop trying to play detective without knowing any facts.
I throughly agree with Rojaah's comment. You folk that slagged the landlord off ought to be really ashamed of yourselves. I would also add that this arrestee is also not guilty until charged and then after his trial.
If I was the landlord, I would be going through all the press reports as to potential libel, though most papers do have a phalanx of lawyers screening their material. The web and sites like this are also liable to libel suits too.......so I reiterate be careful what and how you write here - you never know but AB may have to come after you. And cases against websites are beginning to emerge; jsut in the last week or so the motion to identify folk associated with WEilileaks from assocaited websites......
If I was the landlord, I would be going through all the press reports as to potential libel, though most papers do have a phalanx of lawyers screening their material. The web and sites like this are also liable to libel suits too.......so I reiterate be careful what and how you write here - you never know but AB may have to come after you. And cases against websites are beginning to emerge; jsut in the last week or so the motion to identify folk associated with WEilileaks from assocaited websites......
"Is there any inkling" ?
I take it you'd be delighted to let the world and his wife know if it was you who'd been nicked, eh? Not convicted of anything, not charged with anything, probably not even finished being interviewed? Yet here we are, like baying wolves at the door, demanding to know who the poor barsteward is?
Does anyone even pause for a minute to think that there's just the teeny weeniest possibility that this guy may turn out to be innocent? What then if every man and his dog knows his identity? Loads of the wolves at the door would still think "he must have been involved - somehow".
If he turns out to be the killer, we'll all know soon enough - when the time is right. In the meantime this shouldn't be treated like some kind of tittle tattle event where nobody on here can rest unless the poor sod's name, rank and number's known to all the busybodies here who have nothing better to occupy their little braincell with.
Give us a break! Think of the victim's family instead of your miserable selves - just for once? Coronation St + Eastenders could do some recruiting on here, I tell you!
I take it you'd be delighted to let the world and his wife know if it was you who'd been nicked, eh? Not convicted of anything, not charged with anything, probably not even finished being interviewed? Yet here we are, like baying wolves at the door, demanding to know who the poor barsteward is?
Does anyone even pause for a minute to think that there's just the teeny weeniest possibility that this guy may turn out to be innocent? What then if every man and his dog knows his identity? Loads of the wolves at the door would still think "he must have been involved - somehow".
If he turns out to be the killer, we'll all know soon enough - when the time is right. In the meantime this shouldn't be treated like some kind of tittle tattle event where nobody on here can rest unless the poor sod's name, rank and number's known to all the busybodies here who have nothing better to occupy their little braincell with.
Give us a break! Think of the victim's family instead of your miserable selves - just for once? Coronation St + Eastenders could do some recruiting on here, I tell you!
