News0 min ago
Getting the sack by email.
What exactly is the 'insult' that after 22 years of service you get notice that your services are no longer required by email ? Is it better that the information comes on a piece of paper on an envelope? At one time the standard way of learning that your loved one had been killed in action was by telegram, was this considered an 'acceptable' method ? Does it really matter, or am I missing the point?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Khandro. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Because it doesn't give that person a chance to respond, ask questions or just look somebody in the eye. Some people in some situations may accept being made redundant/getting the sack as fair enough but some people in other situations may like the chance to give their view about events or find out more about it.
The longer a person has been working somewhere the more they feel like their view matters or or that possibly they should have kept their job over somebody else who did and find out why they didn't, this is why it is insulting to people, because they feel like they have given a lot and not been given any dignity.
Now maybe they deserved to be insulted, maybe they were lazy, theiving, lying little so and so's who were sleeping with the boss for 22 years, who knows, but fact of the matter is insulted they were.
The longer a person has been working somewhere the more they feel like their view matters or or that possibly they should have kept their job over somebody else who did and find out why they didn't, this is why it is insulting to people, because they feel like they have given a lot and not been given any dignity.
Now maybe they deserved to be insulted, maybe they were lazy, theiving, lying little so and so's who were sleeping with the boss for 22 years, who knows, but fact of the matter is insulted they were.
-- answer removed --
The point I'm (perhaps badly) making is that the news item is not how they were informed, but rather the fact that they were sacked at all. I think this is being somewhat deflated by by this way of presenting it. But I would also add that emailing is here to stay and is a new way off transmitting information good or bad. If you learned that you had won £1,000 by email, would you complain?
Being sacked by email or by letter is unpleasant and wrong but I doubt the actual sacking came as a surprise . They were on one year contracts after spending 22 years in the service and knew that thereafter it was dependant on the army's manpower requirements.
When I was in the army there were a number of long serving officers and men who played very little active part in the day to day running of the army .If this was a civilian company we wouldn't have had all this emotion .
When I was in the army there were a number of long serving officers and men who played very little active part in the day to day running of the army .If this was a civilian company we wouldn't have had all this emotion .
The predominantly salient fact is, that that were SACKED, and this is presented by the media as if the the method was itself the news. I don't think it would matter to me how I was informed. letter, telephone, email or smoke signal. George Orwell noted that during the Spanish civil war, newspapers reported that nuns had been 'raped on refectory tables' as though the information that where the crime was committed, was important and somehow increased its severity.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.