Donate SIGN UP

Weak Cameron

Avatar Image
modeller | 18:59 Sun 20th Feb 2011 | News
12 Answers
I'm posting this again as the link didn't work. However in case this one doesn't the link is that Cameron is setting up a commission to look into the way Europe imposes it's laws on us frequently by using the ECHR , althougth he talked tough in opposition so far he has given way to the Lib/Dems at every turn . He has also appointed Ken Clarke another Euro apologist . We don't need another committee to kick it into the long grass.
I didn't like grinning cat Tony Blair and his human rights wife but at least he was a leader . Cameron is a talker . The link was on the BBC web site .

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-12482442
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 12 of 12rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by modeller. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Let's hope so, DC seemed angry about several decisions last week.
Europe doesn't impose it's laws on us - they are our laws

We signed up to it - blame Winston Churchill

It's nothing to do with the EU we were signatories 20 years before Ted Heath took us into the EEC

The human rights act changed nothing either it just gave UK courts the ability to make judgements without people having to trot across to Strassbourg to be heard.

Of course they could withdraw from it and be the only European ountry other than Bellarus to do so and lose just about any shred of credibility and influence with the other European countries - which Cameron is not about to do.

So he'll bluster a lot and do something ineffectual and wrap it up as a success before it all falls apart.

Once again the Tories pull themselves apart because the notion of Europe offends their Patriotic dignity.
The European Court of Human Rights entered into under Harold Wilson's Labour Government, can still override anything judged in Britain.

/// It was not until Harold Wilson's government in the 1960s that British citizens were able to bring claims in the European Court of Human Rights.///
There's nothing wrong with being a part of Europe and in fact we rely on 50% of our trade with them. The problem comes when they try to dictate social, law issues and human rights.

However if you are not a player you cannot change the rules. Because we never signed up to the Euro we have never been taken seriously by other members so we get what we deserved.
Question Author
jake //We signed up to it - blame Winston Churchill //
When did Churchill say he or the UK wanted to join the EU ?

//
Mark as Best Answer
Europe doesn't impose it's laws on us - they are our laws

We signed up to it - blame Winston Churchill

//It's nothing to do with the EU we were signatories 20 years before Ted Heath took us into the EEC //
When did we join the EEC 20 years before T
Question Author
jake //It's nothing to do with the EU we were signatories 20 years before Ted Heath took us into the EEC //
Where and when did we join the EEC or the EU 20 years before TH ?

If that's true why did Ted Heath join up again into it if we were already a member ?
If we were already a member who/why was De Gaule saying Non to us for all those years ?
Question Author
jake // It's nothing to do with the EU we were signatories 20 years before Ted Heath //

If that is true why during those years were we a member of EFTA which was separate and independant of the EEC.. and we had to leave it when Heath took us into the EEC.
Question Author
No answer jake ? I'm not surprised . Here is an extract from his speech :
" But none of what you wrote proves that, even if Churchill was a europhile, he would approve the present EU.
His last words on the subject, nearly 60 years ago, were "I never thought that Britain or the British Commonwealth should, either individually or collectively, become an integral part of a European Federation, and have never given the slightest support to the idea."
So for EU-supporters now to try to enlist him in the EU cause is hardly legitimate. "
Modeller

I assume Jake was referring to the distinction between the european union and The Council of Europe which was founded in 1949 with

<< a particular emphasis on legal standards, human rights, democratic development, the rule of law and cultural co-operation. It has 47 member states with some 800 million citizens. It is distinct from the European Union (EU) which has common policies, binding laws and only twenty-seven members. The two do however share certain symbols such as their flag.>>

Churchill was an instigator of this and UK one of the first signatories long before 'The Common Market'

<<In his famous speech at the University of Zurich on 19 September 1946, Sir Winston Churchill called for a United States of Europe and the creation of a Council of Europe.

Admittedly he may not have favoured a Federal Europe which The EC is allegedly becoming.
.
-- answer removed --
Question Author
zeuhl I know what's he doing .He does it all the time to excuse the excessives, of all the EU institutions .
The point is most politicians since WW II knew that peaceful unity was needed in Europe but that did not mean a single over-riding big brother organisation which dictates rules and regulatons to cover every aspect of our lives. That is a dictatorship.
It reduces each country's government to the level of a parish council.
We joined EFTA which would have allowed free trade between members but Heath left it to join the EEC. It was bad then but since then there has been 6 major treaties each one tightening the EUs grip on us. Five of them were agreed by Blair/Brown and Blair also gave away 20% of our rebate.

1 to 12 of 12rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Weak Cameron

Answer Question >>