Question Author
/// Those who are old enough to have witnessed all these change are the only ones qualified to remark on them.///
Yes I knew when I typed that, that some would just pick up on that one sentence, without taking into account the rest of the post.
Oneeyedvic, Just because you had made your own interpretation of it, and found that you did not agree with, there was no need to go as far to say that it was 'stupid'
To use your two examples, /// you can't have an opinion on childbirth if you are not a woman"///
I did not say 'have an opinion' I said 'qualified to remark on' yes you can have an "opinion" on childbirth", but you are not "qualified to remark on" how it is to have a baby, since you have not been through that experience.'
/// "you don't understand racism if you are not coloured" ///
Once again you can have an opinion on racism, but you are not qualified to understand it, if you are not coloured.
Regarding Glasgow I am not 'qualified' (there's that difference once again) to remark on it's crime, simply because I have never been there to witness the changes since immigration.
/// go outside with your eyes open. It is not as dangerous or as terrible as you think.///
I do go outside with my eyes open, and it is as terrible as I think it is in some areas. Regarding dangerous, yes it is take the number of shootings and stabbings almost on a daily basis, I may not have witnessed them myself but they have been reported in the papers, are you saying that they are lying?
/// There is not a foreigner with a knife around the corner, chatting to a paedophile who wants to steal your children.///
Try telling that to one of the innocent victims that have been attacked on their way home. Or to some parents that dare not let their children out alone.
/// The vast majority of the 3 mil