Perhaps the Editorial Team could devise some sort of ratings system where we can register our moral outrage and then arrange it in some sort of league table...........?
The more epithets we use when describing a criminal and the more emotive terms we use when describing their victims; the greater graphic content used describing either a) their acts, or b) what we, personally, would like to do with them (and with which type of rusty implement), the higher the position in the table.........and, of course, the "How would you feel if it was your - - - -" would act as an accumulator bonus and propel the user to the top of the league. However, perhaps as a check, using the words 'hand-wringing', 'liberal', 'lefty' 'yoghurt (in any context other than natural or fruit)' and 'peace-muesli' could see the user deducted points or banished to the relegation places ?