Petal Flower -
regarding Glitter's back catalogue - he sold the rights and royalties for a seum rumoured to be around �5 million before his arrest and imprisonment. At that time, his catalogue was quite valuable, apearing on a number of compilations, and still getting radio play. Of course, in the lkight of his convicitions, his record plays have virtually stopped, and his catalogue is virtually worthless, but he still has the lump sum, so that was a shrewd move on his part.
As an occasional party DJ, I always loved playing his songs, which were always massively popular, but since his conviction, I have never played a song of his - I am unsure what the reaction of an audience would be.
I have debated the dilema of the art versus the artist before on the AB - do we enjoy art even though the artist has behaved in a reprehensible way?