ChatterBank0 min ago
Is 'additised' a real word?
27 Answers
There's a new advert for Esso fuel and the small print describes performance 'compared to additised fuel'. Is 'additised' a real word?
Answers
JJ's succint answer says it all.
Words are constantly being added to the English language. Just because a word might not have made it into the OED yet, that doesn't mean that it's not 'real'.
I've just checked the OED website. 'Additise' isn't recognised. However a quick Google search finds it used it loads of documents from reputable...
I've just checked the OED website. 'Additise' isn't recognised. However a quick Google search finds it used it loads of documents from reputable...
19:56 Mon 01st Oct 2012
One man who additized lots of words to our collective vocabularies was George W. Bush (hence the zee spelling).
Talking of Americans, my pet peeve in ads is the Enterprise car hire one, with the Brit and American arguing over the pronunciation of "aluminium". The Brit says "It's got a U in it," but the difference in spelling between the British and American versions is an I, not a U.
Talking of Americans, my pet peeve in ads is the Enterprise car hire one, with the Brit and American arguing over the pronunciation of "aluminium". The Brit says "It's got a U in it," but the difference in spelling between the British and American versions is an I, not a U.
Yes, Ich, I'm well aware of the difference between transitive and intransitive verbs. However, in the circumstances we're discussing, it did nor seem to me to be too great a 'leap' from one usage to the other, given what we all know about language's constant tendency to evolve.
I agree that the advert gets it utterly wrong, Ellipsis, but Sir Humphrey Davy who discovered aluminium in 1807 originally called it 'alumium' without an 'ni', before altering it to ‘alumina’ and then changing it yet again to 'aluminum' still without the second 'i'. Later, the editor of a British scientific journal changed it to 'aluminium' "in preference,” he said, “to aluminum which has a less classical sound." Presumably he wanted it to chime with sodium, potassium, chromium etc.
However, it has to be said that the man who discovered it finally called it exactly what the AMERICANS now call it, not what WE call it! The supposedly “missing 'i'" British people often refer to didn't GO... in fact, it CAME! So who’s really right, those who accept the discoverer’s nomenclature or those who accept an obscure magazine editor’s nomenclature?
But still…the advert is ghastly!
I agree that the advert gets it utterly wrong, Ellipsis, but Sir Humphrey Davy who discovered aluminium in 1807 originally called it 'alumium' without an 'ni', before altering it to ‘alumina’ and then changing it yet again to 'aluminum' still without the second 'i'. Later, the editor of a British scientific journal changed it to 'aluminium' "in preference,” he said, “to aluminum which has a less classical sound." Presumably he wanted it to chime with sodium, potassium, chromium etc.
However, it has to be said that the man who discovered it finally called it exactly what the AMERICANS now call it, not what WE call it! The supposedly “missing 'i'" British people often refer to didn't GO... in fact, it CAME! So who’s really right, those who accept the discoverer’s nomenclature or those who accept an obscure magazine editor’s nomenclature?
But still…the advert is ghastly!
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.