Quizzes & Puzzles1 min ago
test message spelling
I understand the need to shorten words in a text message because of space limitations, but does anyone else find it amusing when people, who are obviously in a 'shortnin' frame of mind, actually make words longer or just mis-spell them but don't actually shorten them? I recently had 'carnt' instead of 'cant' or 'can't' and often get 'woz' for 'was'.
Answers
No best answer has yet been selected by joko. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Cue my eternal rant. I hate text language, especially when used on the internet. I can just about accept shortening of words in a mobile phone text message; there is a limit to the number of characters you can send. But elsewhere it strikes me as lazy and illiterate. As you point out, some words are actually lengthened.
In a similar vein, it has always seemed to me ironic that the abbreviation for the world wide web has more syllables than the phrase itself.
I don't use text speak myself, but I think the reason for some words are misspelled is because the letters are on different keys on the phone. When using the "dictionary" on the mobile you get suggestions for words which is made of eg. a, s and w. E.g saw and was, when you use the letters o, w, z you only get woz because you have already added that word to the dictionary in the phone. So it's simply an invented mobile word to make the typing faster. I've heard researchers call text speak pretty advanced and that the kids using it are pretty good at language because they can juggle with words the way they do.
I must say than when text speak is used other places than in a text message I get a bit annoyed myself :0)
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.