Am I the only person who has a violent antipathy to this derogatory, illiterate term for Christmas? I ask this not because of any religious reason, merely out of concern for ignorance and disrespect which may be caused to others.
It's Christmas without the 'Christ' which is about right for the majority of people.
I personally just think it's a nice bit of holiday with some presents and a few drinking sessions but then I don't love Jesus and if people want to love Jesus then they can have a proper Crimbo in their own special way.
the -o ending is standard abbreviation, though actually more common in Australia, I think (where rubbish men are garbos). The usual ending in Britain is -y ('cardy').
I think it's probably spelt crimbo and 'Chrimbo' is holly incorrect.
"Holly incorrect" How appropriate and seasonal. However, as it's a made-up word there is no 'correct' spelling as such. Indeed, I would suggest that Chr is more in tune with the original etymology than Cr.
Crimbo doesn't have the H of Christmas (not in my book) - at least Xmas ((which I too dislike) has the X-Chi from the Greek, but I don't like the shorthand. Crimbo - to me - just means the commercial side of Christmas, I don't like the expression at all. I acknowledge the religious significance many have for Christmas and I don't think it's right to jazz it up or dumb it down - we don't say Happy Hanniko! or Eidbo! or Diwalibo! for Jews or Muslims or Sikhs.
well, it's been Xmas for years, with only minor mutterings of discontent. I don't say "crimbo" because it sounds like trying to be down wid da yoof, and I don't do that. But, like many pious scribes before me, I do occasionally shorten it to Xmas in writing. (And 'Christmas' itself is a shortened form, in both written and spoken English.)