A nit-picking question. I find the preamble (final sentence) mildly confusing. As it stands it seems that the author alone should be highlighted. However, the construction hints that both arch-enemy AND author are to be hightlighted. If the former were that case, the 'and' could have been replaced by a full stop; if the latter applied, then 'is' should be replaced by a comma. Anyone else find it confusing.