Crosswords2 mins ago
Listener No 4163 Aversions by Brock
53 Answers
Am I honestly the first of the Friday Club? What a fine, interesting set of clues. We guessed the theme quite early, which helped. Brock has produced another excellent challenge. Thank you Brock!
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Ruthrobin. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Now back to Mash which we have scarcely started so probably wasting our time, although we have solved most of the clues. In the first grid do 1ac and 1dn go in in conventional left corner fashion and, if so, is there an obvious reason (other than stupidity) why we can't seem to place other early acrosses/downs, even bearing in mind clues going off the edge? Any oblique assistance welcome,
Clever idea, perhaps not entirely capitalised on to the max, but quite fun to find links after gridfill ... I wonder if anyone knows how many versions there are in total? On a different note, did anyone else notice in this weekend's FT that one lucky Gozoan (Gozoite?) won both the Cryptic and the Polymath? Now what are the odds of that? Some guys have all ... (Z Cup for me) ...
IainGrace - though perhaps not strictly necessary, fully understanding the theme significantly speeds up resolution time. Again having access to the additional reference clearly defines the number of possible choices and helps remove any potential ambuguities.
Re 4162 I will respond on the previous thread.
Re 4162 I will respond on the previous thread.
In an amusing coincidence, the "reference" arrived at my room on Friday night - the day before I would need it! Solved (almost) the full puzzle without actually using that reference, but still, knowing what it was and being able to guess at it early on, meant I could locate the misprints much quicker than I otherwise would have.
Perhaps an unfortunate Listener, then, in that I only worked out fully what was going on after I'd done it all - rather like that "Measure for Measure" one a few weeks back, which also could be solved without needing a "complete" knowledge of the earlier solutions. Using the reference I've been able to work backwards on a couple of the asterisked clues, though.
Bear69, re last week's - I'm guessing your solution is the same as the one I've got written down, though I know what's wrong with it. If so - you won't be far away from the correct solution, so keep thinking about it!
Perhaps an unfortunate Listener, then, in that I only worked out fully what was going on after I'd done it all - rather like that "Measure for Measure" one a few weeks back, which also could be solved without needing a "complete" knowledge of the earlier solutions. Using the reference I've been able to work backwards on a couple of the asterisked clues, though.
Bear69, re last week's - I'm guessing your solution is the same as the one I've got written down, though I know what's wrong with it. If so - you won't be far away from the correct solution, so keep thinking about it!
Little time this weekend, but have just finished. The theme was easy to spot, but I found some of the clues difficult - I always think misprints in the definition are much the hardest to deal with. It does seem to be one where the grid can be filled without sorting out every detail fully (doubtless the purists do that).
I think I've finished but would be happier if I could tie the asterisked clues together and understood 'in an order determined by the grid'. I agree with some others that it appears possible to complete it with solving all aspects.
I did find some of the clues quite difficult and was helped significantly by getting the subject somewhat fortuitously.
Happy with my decision not to attempt last week's given the comments here but looking forward to next week's numerical challenge - may live to regret that!
I did find some of the clues quite difficult and was helped significantly by getting the subject somewhat fortuitously.
Happy with my decision not to attempt last week's given the comments here but looking forward to next week's numerical challenge - may live to regret that!