News28 mins ago
Listener 4197 - Duet for One by Bandmaster
54 Answers
No, I haven't finished it. I just thought I would point out that it is up on the usual site, but under the wrong date, 2012-06-29. Whether this is significant, I cannot tell (It was an old cat, Oswyn's, birthday, but I suspect that is irrelevant)
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Philoctetes. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.This really is a "keep right on to the end of the road" which at one point I thought might be part of the theme. So many layers to play with, and each (mostly) satisfying. I do find myself with a substantial piece of the puzzle which, were I competing, I wouldn't send in, which seems a pity, and I spotted the object of the very last instruction long before completing the whole. But these are minor quibbles. A very engaging puzzle with a very original feel.
I don't often try to complete a Listener in one sitting, but I just couldn't put this one down. Whenever I thought about going to bed something in me said: "Oh, you've almost finished - give it another five minutes". So I did. Finally it's done, and now the sun is approaching the horizon. Do I care? Not a bit.
This is a fine example of grid construction based on a clever idea. Not ultra-hard, but a challenge, and very entertaining. I thoroughly enjoyed it. Thank you, Bandmaster.
This is a fine example of grid construction based on a clever idea. Not ultra-hard, but a challenge, and very entertaining. I thoroughly enjoyed it. Thank you, Bandmaster.
Tilbee: I agree on the "option" feel to this one, though I think you'd be very brave to send in the grid with the final instruction completed without the confirmation the "option" phase gives.
The point of this one was highlighted admirably by Texasetes: once you get into it, it leads you on (and on) with a kind of cruciverbal generosity: you just want to see how the next step works, and then do the one after that.
I'd love to see anyone managing this with the published paper, a pencil and a rubber only. Doubt it's possible.
The point of this one was highlighted admirably by Texasetes: once you get into it, it leads you on (and on) with a kind of cruciverbal generosity: you just want to see how the next step works, and then do the one after that.
I'd love to see anyone managing this with the published paper, a pencil and a rubber only. Doubt it's possible.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.