I hope this will not be regarded as tactless: on the contrary I suspect A. himself either was then or is now aware of the irony (or was it really coincidence?) --- Guardian Cryptic No 25,597, published getting on for a year ago, contained the signs of the zodiac omitting "Cancer". Am I reading too much into this fact, or was it perhaps even partly intended as a hint? Don't want to create a myth, but thought after mature reflection I could at least remark on the fact, whether it has any significance or not.