Arts & Literature3 mins ago
The Week 1140
10 Answers
1) Clobber I'd cast? Yes (9) E?D?S?A?T
2) Tricked someone, as Number 10 rarely did in the past? (6,1,4,3). Letters definite are P-L--- A -A-T -N- . The answer would appear to have to be PULLED A FAST ONE, but could someone please explain the allusion to "Number 10 in the past".
2) Tricked someone, as Number 10 rarely did in the past? (6,1,4,3). Letters definite are P-L--- A -A-T -N- . The answer would appear to have to be PULLED A FAST ONE, but could someone please explain the allusion to "Number 10 in the past".
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by TioMateo. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Given nobody is a able to identify an allusion to Number 10 and the pulling of a fast one in the past, I am left with the disappointing conclusion that this is a "clue wishing to convey an element of political comment", with Number 10 obviously referring to the Government of the day, and the fast one - presumably - referring to the setter's perception of Mrs May's "Chequers Deal". Whether or not solvers agree with this perceived sentiment is irrelevant to the breach of "political neutrality" that I would expect from all setters. Does anybody else have a different view on this?
Think you're all right with the cricket reference.
'In the past' Numbers 9,10 and 11 were referred to as 'rabbits' for their lack of batting skills ie they were bowlers only.
In today's game everybody is expected to be a batsman/bowler or bowler/batsman so a No 10 is now more likely to play a pull shot against a fast bowler.
'In the past' Numbers 9,10 and 11 were referred to as 'rabbits' for their lack of batting skills ie they were bowlers only.
In today's game everybody is expected to be a batsman/bowler or bowler/batsman so a No 10 is now more likely to play a pull shot against a fast bowler.