Stumbling Firstly, Or Arranging...
Crosswords5 mins ago
This one made me laugh - it has a simple solution.
No best answer has yet been selected by wolf63. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Yeah a subway might well work.
Trouble with signage is that the brain starts ignoring things that are too common as these collisions show.
Better to have something easily repairable, and noisy when hit, to hit first and make it obvious to the driver; and it's cheaper than getting the bridge hit and repaired.
Of course it there's a way to detect excess height and create unmissable flashing signs, that'd be worth a try too.
wolf63 - if you think drivers aren't told not to go under low bridges with tall vehicles you must be living in a dream world. If telling them was the solution it would have ceased to be a problem when the highway code was first introduced. They are human, they forget about the size of their truck, the warning signs don't register in their minds, they simply screw up! Your "simple" solution hasn't worked for decades.
Other solutions require additional hardware at bridges as suggested above. Probably the cost of instaling it at ALL low bridges would be prohibitive. Maybe if there are particularly problematic ones it could be considered.
I seem to remember a low bridge as you approach Romsey, Hants from the east on the A3090 which flashed lights as you approached and lit up a sign warning high vehicles to immediately turn right to avoid the bridge. It's a few years since I last used that road and I can't remember whether it flashes for all vehicles or just tall ones (I drive a car) but I've certainly seen it lit, possibly by a following vehicle. Flashing lights catch the eye where static signs may not.
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.