As I said on another thread, even after initially entering the wrong 'duck'
at 14a, I found the puzzle straightforward bar having two possibilites
for 25d.
Yes, I see that, M, but - as the question-mark at the end of the clue suggests - one might expect a bit of 'setterish' shenanigans! And that, I believe, is precisely what we got, as I tried to indicate by emboldening the SIDE element of the word. Muso's final letter here is NOT a mistake; it is - I believe - a quite deliberate messing about with the concept of 'sides'. I'll say no more. Cheers
I agree that 25d is unsatisfactory. I can think of six possibilities, but if pushed I would opt for one that retains some of the character of the common word.
Yes, it does look as if Muso has overlooked a few possibilities. 25 aside, 10 can also be put inside the theme word, and 27 also offers a couple of arrangements.
Thanks for all your comments, and especially to mintyman for the pdf link
Not quite sure I follow your logic cruciverbali, unless you ignore the brackets in the instructions around (in one case) which I guess is 'possible'. I feel it is more likely the reading is that no lights are placed 'with-in' the common word, and I can only see one solution for 27a that all sits very nicely with the complete instructions - assuming I have got it right of course.
If I have it right it's a shame there isn't a spare 'B' to give a nice finishing touch to 8 down. Maybe I'm missing something.
I think this is a disappointing crossword. Have we had Muso before? I can't remember. Here are my thoughts:
There are 5 clues with the answer hidden in the clue. Too many?
1 across has a lazy definition of eyeshade. is that fair?
31 across has a simple answer but it seems that the clue is slightly wrong.
4 down is a clumsy clue.
here are multiple solutions for 25 down
I have finished the puzzle but don't get the cryptic part of 19d (but that's my problem)
I agree that quizmonster is right about 14 across.
And that 27 across is most likely container.