ChatterBank0 min ago
Listener 4088 - Digimix by Oyler
93 Answers
Well, thank goodness we have a long weekend. I think I might need that to work out what the blazes the clues mean! I had one theory, but the rubric that all entries are different turned me towards a slight revision of that. I shall go along on that hypothesis for now - but not until I have had a nice, strong cup of tea!
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Philoctetes. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I love the numericals, but I think the balance is about right. What I find, though, is that, if I take a break (as is inevitable) it takes me some time to reach the stage of deduction that I had reached before. With "wordals" one can just dive straight back in. So I tend to submerse myself more and get them finished quicker - and annoy the rest of the family more!
i have finally seen the woods from the trees (or the clues from the entries). The clues are going downwards, with the bold P being different from the normal P (an entry). each answer to bold P has to be 4 digits and they are all different. so there are 11 different X_Y_Z (in this crossword anyway). this is the first time i have had to use an excel spreadsheet to help me along the way....back to it
Philoctetes - I think a strong cup of (double) absinthe is on the menu for me!
Dr B. Will Excel help with this puzzle? Honest - I'd like to know, I now own a copy and if it'll help then let me know.
My first number puzzle, and my fifth Listener - A lamb to the slaughter.... (I hope that'll amuse some of you)!!!!
Dr B. Will Excel help with this puzzle? Honest - I'd like to know, I now own a copy and if it'll help then let me know.
My first number puzzle, and my fifth Listener - A lamb to the slaughter.... (I hope that'll amuse some of you)!!!!
i agree turnerjmw. my quickest numerical listener. although I did use excel, I did not use any fancy calculations/equations. therefore i hope we dont give anything away this week, because the maths is quite straightforward.
i don't like the use of the word "entries" in the preamble and It is also a shame there was no little extra that I wish for in the numericals. nevertheless, well constructed as usual Oyler.
i don't like the use of the word "entries" in the preamble and It is also a shame there was no little extra that I wish for in the numericals. nevertheless, well constructed as usual Oyler.
Don't give up easylistener - as turner jmw says, numericals are normally fairly straightforward once you find a way in.
In today's puzzle I found this codepad useful to work out the 2 squares summing to any particular 9-digit number:
http://codepad.org/DuNNQYrh
In today's puzzle I found this codepad useful to work out the 2 squares summing to any particular 9-digit number:
http://codepad.org/DuNNQYrh
I agree that it is relatively straightforward once you realise how the clues are arranged - However being something of a programmer manqué I could not resist writing a program in Excel to list out the possibilities for P, Q, X, Y & Z (which incidentally were far more than I had guessed) - Given that cheat I'm not going to send it in.
By the way - is there a pattern to the appearance of the numerical ones? Some people seemed to know last week that this would be one.
By the way - is there a pattern to the appearance of the numerical ones? Some people seemed to know last week that this would be one.
.. or maybe do we sometimes take time out from having a conversation to ask for answers? This tends to be a fairly civilised area of the board, society - it's quite refreshing / inspiring some times to have a chat ... and we don't always need answers. Often just a friendly hint - or even just knowing that someone else is having the same nightmare with a clue as you are - will help.
BlackHugh: In what way is what you have done a cheat? Is it a cheat, for example, to extract all five letter words with the pattern ?h?a? from a dictionary to find one which satisfies a clue in a "normal" crossword? Clever of you to write an Excel programme, sure, but you still have to work out how it all fits together. Wish I could do it, or work out how to use that codepad thing Mysterons offers. Some of us just blunder away - damned if I'll let this be the first one I don't complete this year - but I won't be upset by someone who finds a short cut. I might (might!) be a tad miffed by the ease with which turnerjmw has solved this thing, but he hasn't cheated by being confoundedly adept with numbers. He has, however, "given away" a great deal: this thing can be done, and it's actually not that hard. All I have to do is do it my way. It'll take a while!
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.