Starmer's Approval Rating Plummets,
News1 min ago
When Someone Finally Invents A Teleportation Machine
69 Answers
Which cautionary measures can we take to make sure that the real threat seen on the film "Th Fly" doesn't happen? Not only at the insect level but the more frightening bacteria level as if a human dna mixes with a deadly bacteria or viruses dna this could spell the end of mankind as we know it as then we'd have a a giant virus/bacteria capable of pro creating intentionally and with the iq of what could be a genius.
So how could we best avoid this?
So how could we best avoid this?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Imabeliever. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
A very subjective answer and I expected no less.
Have an enjoyable evening everyone as off for a little walk to meteor gaze.
Please read some of the links and articles available as there are too many questions and too little answers especially from those who KNOW the answers but are reluctant to share with the rest of due to pressure from the higher ranks if you know what I mean.
As I said good evening and open your minds.
Have an enjoyable evening everyone as off for a little walk to meteor gaze.
Please read some of the links and articles available as there are too many questions and too little answers especially from those who KNOW the answers but are reluctant to share with the rest of due to pressure from the higher ranks if you know what I mean.
As I said good evening and open your minds.
Too cloudy for meteorgazing so here I am again. Siroroacle I have no idea who "Goodlife" is but if they're also a truth hunter with no ties to the "Establishment" then I'd welcome their input here not that I refuse to r from those with ties to the "Establishment" as I also welcome their views on this matter of importance.
So are we in agreement that there's more then meets the eye on those subjects we've already discussed?
So are we in agreement that there's more then meets the eye on those subjects we've already discussed?
As you wish siroracle but for you to have been following this thread and even recommending users to appear on this thread shows a vested interest. I have no idea where your stance on this tricky situation is but I have my suspicions. NEVER feel afraid to voice your true opinions as one opinion is all it sometimes takes to sway the balance and help others crawl from the woodwork to have voice also.
Jim has the Lhc being used for any experiments that has NOT being documented for the publics release? Could you tell us even if you wanted to?
Jim has the Lhc being used for any experiments that has NOT being documented for the publics release? Could you tell us even if you wanted to?
"In layman's terms, for [people who] aren't as scientifically minded as us."
Quite...
I think your last question shows a misunderstanding of what's going on at the LHC and, in particular, how experiments are conducted. There is, for example, no "Dark Matter storage room" where the LHC hides the DM and looks at it periodically, and indeed this means that in a Layman's sense there's not really a "Dark Matter experiment" going on either. By this I mean that no-one stands around in a high-school style lab looking at bubbling beakers and what not.
The practical side of the experiment that goes on is in the end the same for everything we're looking at: take two bunches of particles, zoom them really fast around a circle, and smash them together. Then you look at the stuff that gets spat out. There are many thousands of possible outcomes, and what usually happens is that a lot of them happen all at once.
The experiment part of it is that each team then will look for a specific outcome. This could be, say, proton-like objects called Hadrons, or muons, or a whole list of other things. It also includes potentially Dark Matter, but the key thing is that a) any experiment that would report the discovery of Dark Matter would have done so by not seeing it (but inferring its presence from missing energy in a particular process), and b) all searches for Dark Matter, or anything else exotic, have come up negative so far. This is a far cry I think from the picture conjured up when you talk about the "experiments about dark matter/energy", since those experiments are going on at the same time as and based on the same data as every other experiment, and it's not really a separate thing at all.
The results of these searches are freely available on cern.ch or the arXiv. The raw data is not published, indeed in the process a lot of it is deleted before anyone sets eyes on it, but this is entirely to be expected and is a reflection of the massive amount of computing needed to even begin to look at the results of such collisions. It's an experimental, engineering and computing feat beyond anything we've accomplished so far. The methods behind the analysis are often fairly clearly laid out too; although good luck to anyone who wants to try these experiments at home.
There is nothing going on at the LHC that is mysterious beyond the general problem with understanding modern Particle Physics. It's bloody complicated, but it's not really a secret as to how it's done or what's being searched for.
Quite...
I think your last question shows a misunderstanding of what's going on at the LHC and, in particular, how experiments are conducted. There is, for example, no "Dark Matter storage room" where the LHC hides the DM and looks at it periodically, and indeed this means that in a Layman's sense there's not really a "Dark Matter experiment" going on either. By this I mean that no-one stands around in a high-school style lab looking at bubbling beakers and what not.
The practical side of the experiment that goes on is in the end the same for everything we're looking at: take two bunches of particles, zoom them really fast around a circle, and smash them together. Then you look at the stuff that gets spat out. There are many thousands of possible outcomes, and what usually happens is that a lot of them happen all at once.
The experiment part of it is that each team then will look for a specific outcome. This could be, say, proton-like objects called Hadrons, or muons, or a whole list of other things. It also includes potentially Dark Matter, but the key thing is that a) any experiment that would report the discovery of Dark Matter would have done so by not seeing it (but inferring its presence from missing energy in a particular process), and b) all searches for Dark Matter, or anything else exotic, have come up negative so far. This is a far cry I think from the picture conjured up when you talk about the "experiments about dark matter/energy", since those experiments are going on at the same time as and based on the same data as every other experiment, and it's not really a separate thing at all.
The results of these searches are freely available on cern.ch or the arXiv. The raw data is not published, indeed in the process a lot of it is deleted before anyone sets eyes on it, but this is entirely to be expected and is a reflection of the massive amount of computing needed to even begin to look at the results of such collisions. It's an experimental, engineering and computing feat beyond anything we've accomplished so far. The methods behind the analysis are often fairly clearly laid out too; although good luck to anyone who wants to try these experiments at home.
There is nothing going on at the LHC that is mysterious beyond the general problem with understanding modern Particle Physics. It's bloody complicated, but it's not really a secret as to how it's done or what's being searched for.
Apart from the bewhiskered bit.....
https:/
https:/
Many thanks jim for an informative answer that is understandable to the masses. If at anytime you want to join the growing legion of scientists and geniuses who want to bring the truth to the public then google my username and you'll find a similar site with the same name and you'll find me there on the forums after a short search. You can shoot me a private message in this or any other name in strict confidence if you feel you have anything you want to get off your chest. I've been there 10 years and will be there for the next 10 so there is no rush. I await your pm one day.
Latest Posts
ChatterBank4 mins ago
Quizzes & Puzzles9 mins ago
ChatterBank12 mins ago
Crosswords23 mins ago
Charging Order On Leasehold Flat
Law30 mins ago
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.