Sometime today NASA will be releasing images of Sagittarius A, the black hole at the centre of our Milky Way galaxy. (No Mars bar jokes please). Brilliant science to gather and correlate the info using radio telescopes across the World that were synced with an atomic clock. It has taken 2 years to put the image together and I for one can't wait to see it. The link below contains some useful explanations of why and how it was done, and rather good explanatory videos.
According to Dr Mark Morris “There is a speed limit to the spin of a black hole. It’s sort of set by the faster a black hole spins, the smaller is its event horizon.” https://www.universetoday.com/109308/how-fast-do-black-holes-spin/
// But if we can see light around the black hole, why can't we see light in front of, and therefore obscuring, the black hole? //
Best guess is that this Black hole is rotating, so what you are seeing is a disc. It's therefore similar to asking why planets orbit a star in more or less the same plane, rather than orbiting in random circles. Not an unreasonable question by any means, though!
You could be right Jim. It is described as a halo, after all, which tends to suggest it's 2d rather than 3d.
Another possibility is that the eight telescopes were designed to see "through" the various layers between us and the black hole, including the final layer of gas.
Jim.....genuine question. Would a singularity not produce a dome of influence on the matter around it rather than a 2d flat plane? I am aware that the hypothesis shows plumes of matter/energy being ejected from black holes in most theoretic "diagrams" opposite each other and radii of matter being drawn into the centre in a flat plane. I find this harder to envisage than gravity consuming all, from all directions.
"She who must be obeyed" has just pointed out that BBC4 are showing a programme "How to see a black hole" starting 9pm. No innuendo please. It is giving an insight into the method used to take the images we are now getting.
Just a thought. Would the singularity be spinning incredibly fast? Again at speeds that are almost unimaginable? That could, give the accepted model. Then the question is ……..what produces the spin.
No reminders Jim. I am "tired" myself. Haha if you do is good if you don't let's not worry about it. The program on BBC4 was excellent by the way. 1,4,9,16.
Worth a watch Naomi. I caught the last 45minutes and was properly impressed by the men and women doing the graft. Think I need to slip into my own "space travel" for the night. Tired....gardening in the sunshine all afternoon.
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.