Is this good science?

[Theland]

Please help. I am not a scientist, but I need to know if what the author is saying is based on sound science.
Please put aside your own personal beliefs on creationism/evolution, and just examine the scholarship. I don't have the training to do this myself. Many thanks.
http://www.moriel.org/articles/notice_board/re newed_intelligent_design_contra_darwinism.htm

[LazyGun]

Mikey, ID have presented lots of different examples of organs/structures that they say demonstrate ID. Every single one of these has been shown to be perfectly explainable by natural selection / evolution.

If I have misrepresented you position, my apologies... but neither ID nor creationism is a valid scientific alternative to natural selection.

[mikeyp]

Agreed. I personally don't think evolution is a problem for god believers, perhaps for traditional creationists who belive the earth is <1m years old. But it seems to me that if god did create the earth, he might as well have used evolution. Well I better get on with some work! Thanks for the discussion, and thanks for respecting my opinions. :)

[Theland]

Heres another valid opinion on the weakness of Dawkins
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?apage=1 &cid=1164881893390&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle% 2FShowFull

[dawkins]

Read the book yourself Theland. That is the only way you are going to know if Dawkins has good arguments or not.