Donate SIGN UP

Modelling

Avatar Image
Marg0 | 18:20 Thu 15th May 2008 | Science
1 Answers
What are the rules for creating models in science and comparing them to the outcome of experiments? For example I can create a computer model of how I would expect a certain type of thought process to occur. How can I be sure my reasoning does not just become isolated or circular?
Gravatar

Answers

Only 1 answerrss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Marg0. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
The answer to your first question is that there aren't any rules (aside from ethical ones!) - only peer review! Of course if you model a particular process then presumably you want to you use your model to test a hypothesis, i.e. ask an interesting scientific question. To validate your answer you usually need to measure some outputs of your model and compare to experiment, although you could have an a model constructed on the basis of a priori assumptions, like special relativity.

Your second question I guess is philosophical one? I can't really seeing it being a practical problem, because if you have a state of the art model of the brain then it's still a crude approximation, and hence there is no way you'd be concerned with your reasoning being circular. If in the future you had a perfect model then it would be a copy of your brain, and that would resolve the circular nature of the argument.

Only 1 answerrss feed

Do you know the answer?

Modelling

Answer Question >>