Society & Culture0 min ago
2-sided shapes
Hi! My 10 yr old's maths teacher told him that there are no 2-sided shapes and he wants to know if this is right, please? Is a crescent or the centre of a vesica piscis 2-sided? And why isn't a semi-circle a 2-sided shape? Thank you!
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by bemahan. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.There is an interesting debate to be had about whether a circle has one side or an infinite number of sides. If it has an infinite number then I suggest a semi circle and crescent have an infinite number too. I'm afraid I don't know what a vesica piscis is.
I assume the teacher is talking about straight line shapes.
I assume the teacher is talking about straight line shapes.
there is of course that unique object, a single sided shape - the Moebius strip.
To create one, take a strip of paper, 12 ins x 1 in. Make a single turn, and join the ends together. With a pencil draw a line lengthways down the strip back to the point you started. You now have a line covering the whole strip and its apparent 2 sides yet that line crossed no boundaries, so a single side with a single boundary
To create one, take a strip of paper, 12 ins x 1 in. Make a single turn, and join the ends together. With a pencil draw a line lengthways down the strip back to the point you started. You now have a line covering the whole strip and its apparent 2 sides yet that line crossed no boundaries, so a single side with a single boundary
It took me a long time to think about it but I have come to the conclusion that there is in fact a two-sided shape. A circle is classed as a one sided shape, because it has no corners but if however, you cut a circle in half and draw a line down the cut you actually get a semi-circle, which would have one circular side and one straight with corners, making it a two-sided shape.
Strictly speaking, a side has to be a straight line (at least, in normal geometry). Hence, a semicircle is not regarded as a two-sided shape, as one of its "sides" would be a curve (ie not a side), and as a result the smallest number of sides a shape can have is three.
I'd also be careful in regarding a curve as an infinite number of sides -- all statements about infinity are fraught with danger unless you go to infinity in "the right way". A curve is a curve; it can only ever be approximated by straight lines, never replicated exactly.
I'd also be careful in regarding a curve as an infinite number of sides -- all statements about infinity are fraught with danger unless you go to infinity in "the right way". A curve is a curve; it can only ever be approximated by straight lines, never replicated exactly.
Arguments take on a 'shape' and have 2 sides. But sometimes each side of an argument can be just like 2 sides of the one coin! That might not be as cray a way of reasoning as it at first seems in an era where we perhaps still think in static terms. But I think it good to encourage kids to keep their thoughts from settling too soon on one view point. I was looking at this book https:/ /books. google. com.au/ books?i d=sTVZB wAAQBAJ &pg =PA83&a mp;lpg= PA83&am p;dq=em pathy+a nd+geom etrical +shapes &so urce=bl &ot s=7HXtt viNNv&a mp;sig= pS7TT4q dJ3LgiT YUuLdHM 9vQyzw& amp;hl= en& sa=X&am p;ved=0 ahUKEwi o4LaIvO HaAhUKw bwKHUqE A-EQ6AE IXDAL#v =onepag e&q =empath y%20and %20geom etrical %20shap es& f=false (Around page 86) it's talking about how we see shapes of things and how that can be stirred up, as in someone in an Earthquake perceiving (the shape of) bodies flying through the air even as their own self was also being tossed about by the powerful forces. The book is called "Choreographing Empathy." Empathy can be considered to be a part of the shape of society and choreography is really the arranging of moving shapes in (moving or static?) space as seen by a (static or moving?) observer. Don't forget that Nikola Tesla was a brilliant scientist and mathematician ... and he thought about shape differently to the confines of his time.