I could spend all day knocking holes in this
Strange how he doesnn't want to talk about massless particles like gluons eh? or show the exact relationship between mass and volume and how it fits the data for all the known particles - neutrino must be a bit of a headache too.
But you have to feel a bit sorry for him - he's got about 20 websites publishing this stuff and is probably winding himself up as to how he's being ignored by the establishment.
Coming down to Earth though - there is very limited evidence for the Higgs Boson - it is quite possible that it doesn't exist.
But that would be good too.
There once was a belief in something called phlogiston
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phlogiston_theory which was liberated when things burnt.
To cut a long story short this held up science for hundreds of years until Priestly and especially Lavoisier showed it was wrong and Oxygen existed.
Showing the Higgs is wrong would be equally usefull
I just don't think we'd be slapping our foreheads and saying Jacky Jerome was right all the time!