Quizzes & Puzzles8 mins ago
Why is Pi wrong?
It should be exactly 3 but it's slightly out. How did that happen?
Could there be somewhere else in the universe where it is 3?
Could there be somewhere else in the universe where it is 3?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ludwig. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
Got a headache Doc? don't read this then.
Pi is the ratio between a circle's circumference and it's diameter. This is the case in Euclidean space - a flat plane.
Now imagine a circle drawn on a bendy sheet of rubber that is stretched in the middle. Now the diameter is much larger Pi has become smaller.
From General relativity we know that large gravitational masses bend space - the value of Pi around a black hole would depend on how you draw your circle and how you measure it.
This is why Pi is normally defined only in Euclidean space.
See here for more on non-euclidean geometries
http://knol.google.co...try/13vv5m9radaus/17#
Pi is the ratio between a circle's circumference and it's diameter. This is the case in Euclidean space - a flat plane.
Now imagine a circle drawn on a bendy sheet of rubber that is stretched in the middle. Now the diameter is much larger Pi has become smaller.
From General relativity we know that large gravitational masses bend space - the value of Pi around a black hole would depend on how you draw your circle and how you measure it.
This is why Pi is normally defined only in Euclidean space.
See here for more on non-euclidean geometries
http://knol.google.co...try/13vv5m9radaus/17#
Obviously what's needed here is a definition of a circle that we can all agree on. Here's one possible definition:
Get a piece of paper and a compass (the one with a pencil attached to one arm and a sharply pointed piece of metal to the other). Stick the pointy thing into the paper and rotate the compass, holding it near the top where the two arms are joined, while keeping the pencil point in contact with the paper. Keep going until the curve drawn by the pencil joins up.
Let's agree to call this kind of curve is a circle.
Now measure the diameter and the circumference and divide the circumference by the diameter. Write down what you get.
Now draw some more circles in the same way but for different distances between the metal point and the pencil point and every time calculate the value of the circumference divided by the diameter.Write it down again.
You will find that you always get a value around 3.1.
Interesting that you always get what appears to be the same number - it isn't obvious.
So let's call this pi.
Get a piece of paper and a compass (the one with a pencil attached to one arm and a sharply pointed piece of metal to the other). Stick the pointy thing into the paper and rotate the compass, holding it near the top where the two arms are joined, while keeping the pencil point in contact with the paper. Keep going until the curve drawn by the pencil joins up.
Let's agree to call this kind of curve is a circle.
Now measure the diameter and the circumference and divide the circumference by the diameter. Write down what you get.
Now draw some more circles in the same way but for different distances between the metal point and the pencil point and every time calculate the value of the circumference divided by the diameter.Write it down again.
You will find that you always get a value around 3.1.
Interesting that you always get what appears to be the same number - it isn't obvious.
So let's call this pi.
No a circle in non euclidean space is still a circle.
the idea of bending the sheet isn't a good analogy when you measure it the distance is still the same from all points to the centre because the radii appear to be warped similarly from our outside perspective.
This is why nobody really came up with non-Euclidean geometry unil the 19th Century - it's pretty difficult to get your head around.
Turns out though that it's just the ticket for solve Einsteins field equations that describe the universe
the idea of bending the sheet isn't a good analogy when you measure it the distance is still the same from all points to the centre because the radii appear to be warped similarly from our outside perspective.
This is why nobody really came up with non-Euclidean geometry unil the 19th Century - it's pretty difficult to get your head around.
Turns out though that it's just the ticket for solve Einsteins field equations that describe the universe