Quizzes & Puzzles22 mins ago
evolution
hi all, here's a thought if evolution changes animals plants etc over hundreds/thousands of years by either adding or removing body parts to adapt to their surroundings how come we still have such a large brain and only use 10% of our brain or only 10% of our brain potential. surely through evolution our brain should have shrunk or not grown to the size it is today if it is not used to its full potential. when answering please remember i am but a humble person so layman terms only thanks
Gaz
Gaz
Answers
Chuck is right. Here's an article about it by a neuroscienti st:
http: //www.thenes s.co...rible -thing-to-wa ste/
http:
14:02 Fri 07th Jan 2011
Chuck is right. Here's an article about it by a neuroscientist:
http://www.theness.co...rible-thing-to-waste/
http://www.theness.co...rible-thing-to-waste/
hi squarebear, in answer to your question I had just heard it was about 10% and assumed it was correct, but as chuckfickens has said aparently it is a myth so am i now right in thinking that we do infact use all of our brain or has there been any proof that there are infact some parts of our brains that are inactive?
-- answer removed --
and also Machiavelli
There are three different kinds of brains, the
one understands things unassisted, the other
understands things when shown by others,
and the third understands neither alone
nor with the explanations of others.
The first kind is most excellent, the second kind
also excellent, but the third useless.
There are three different kinds of brains, the
one understands things unassisted, the other
understands things when shown by others,
and the third understands neither alone
nor with the explanations of others.
The first kind is most excellent, the second kind
also excellent, but the third useless.
The bigger error in fatgaz's question is one that occurs all the time on AB: the assumption that evolution has some sort of plan or aim to make things more efficient or practical.
Evolution has no plan or aim. If a random mutation occurs which might produce a certain change then whether that change happens depends on whether that mutation is 'fit' for the environment it emerges into (natural selection). If that mutation does not , by sheer chance, occur then the change won't happen no matter how desirable and helpful that change might be.
Evolution has no plan or aim. If a random mutation occurs which might produce a certain change then whether that change happens depends on whether that mutation is 'fit' for the environment it emerges into (natural selection). If that mutation does not , by sheer chance, occur then the change won't happen no matter how desirable and helpful that change might be.