ChatterBank35 mins ago
Contactless Limit To Go Up . . . .
31 Answers
. . . . to £100.
Watch the banks try to wriggle out of reimbursing the inevitable rise in fraud claims.
https:/ /www.uk finance .org.uk /press/ press-r eleases /contac tless-l imit-in crease- 100-15- october
Watch the banks try to wriggle out of reimbursing the inevitable rise in fraud claims.
https:/
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Canary42. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Sounds a good idea to me. Anything that makes it easier to carry out transactions can only be good. It remains to be seen whether banks increase their efforts to refuse reimbursement due to fraud. I must say I've had no experience of that. I have only experienced one episode of fraud in all the years I have been using cards and that was following the purchase of a ticket from my local railway station (via Chip & PIN). My CC provider actually contacted me because two identical transactions (mobile phone top ups) had been made shortly after I bought my rail ticket. They stopped my card, sent a replacement and the transactions were voided from my account within a day or two.
did the judge say - "because ay hev not been defrauded - it dont exist"?
well it does judgy baby -
it does cut out ( the card) on the third, but the loss before reporting is still the card holders and he(the teef) got away with free ( yeah free - geddit) bottles of wodka at a shop that knew it wasnt the right card holder.
dropped the card five times in tescos, and got it back three times and had losses twice
have the contactless taken out
well it does judgy baby -
it does cut out ( the card) on the third, but the loss before reporting is still the card holders and he(the teef) got away with free ( yeah free - geddit) bottles of wodka at a shop that knew it wasnt the right card holder.
dropped the card five times in tescos, and got it back three times and had losses twice
have the contactless taken out
//did the judge say - "because ay hev not been defrauded - it dont exist"?//
No, the judge did not say that. In fact if you read his post properly, you will see that he said that he had been defrauded but that his CC provider reimbursed him promptly.
There seems to be an irrational fear among some that (a) they will suffer fraud (which is unlikely) and, if they are, that (b) they will have difficulty getting reimbursed by their bank (which is very unlikely). Reasonable assessment of risk does not seem very prevalent at the moment.
No, the judge did not say that. In fact if you read his post properly, you will see that he said that he had been defrauded but that his CC provider reimbursed him promptly.
There seems to be an irrational fear among some that (a) they will suffer fraud (which is unlikely) and, if they are, that (b) they will have difficulty getting reimbursed by their bank (which is very unlikely). Reasonable assessment of risk does not seem very prevalent at the moment.