Shopping & Style0 min ago
Chess.
22 Answers
Do we have any secret grandmasters on AB - or even low-graders like me ?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Khandro. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I like chess but would not by any stretch of the imagination consider myself a 'Master' - much less a 'Grand' one.
One bit of good news though - I know a few teenagers who have recently half-abandoned their usual games on their phones in favour of playing chess on their phones, either against each other or against the computer. Only half-abandoned, true, but it's encouraging.
One bit of good news though - I know a few teenagers who have recently half-abandoned their usual games on their phones in favour of playing chess on their phones, either against each other or against the computer. Only half-abandoned, true, but it's encouraging.
I once played jim360 via lichess link, I think he won, I blundered, can't remember if we had a rematch or not. You can send a link to anyone to play a game or post the link anywhere including in AB so you can play anonymously. https:/ /liches s.org/
I doubt there are any Grand Masters on AB - to qualify as a Grand Master, you’ have an ELO rating of about 2400.
The chess ELO rating system is based a player having an ELO rating 400 points above their opponent would be expected to score 100% (win all the games), the same ELO rating resulting in a 50% score and a plus 200 ELO rating resulting in a 75% score.
The world chess champion will typically have an ELO rating of around 2800.
I used to play over the board chess for a club and the county first team, but my ELO rating was just over 2000 – so a Grand Master would expect to win virtually every game against me.
I still play chess on-line for the county and have an assigned ELO rating of circa 2150.
Currently the best chess engines have a claimed ELO rating of circa 4000 – and so can beat the human world chess champion with ease.
The chess ELO rating system is based a player having an ELO rating 400 points above their opponent would be expected to score 100% (win all the games), the same ELO rating resulting in a 50% score and a plus 200 ELO rating resulting in a 75% score.
The world chess champion will typically have an ELO rating of around 2800.
I used to play over the board chess for a club and the county first team, but my ELO rating was just over 2000 – so a Grand Master would expect to win virtually every game against me.
I still play chess on-line for the county and have an assigned ELO rating of circa 2150.
Currently the best chess engines have a claimed ELO rating of circa 4000 – and so can beat the human world chess champion with ease.
Hymie; I have two computer chess sets & I could turn one on at a high level for my moves, but that would be pointless cheating - though I guess it's done, and you never know whether the opponent is doing just that in online games.
But I think a suggestion from a friend on AB would not be out of order.
But I think a suggestion from a friend on AB would not be out of order.
Having spent far too long playing chess and analysing chess positions – these are a couple of quotes I totally agree with.
The ability to play chess is the sign of a gentleman. The ability to play chess well is the sign of a wasted life. (Paul Morphy)
Chess is as elaborate a waste of human intelligence as you can find outside an advertising agency. (Raymond Chandler)
The ability to play chess is the sign of a gentleman. The ability to play chess well is the sign of a wasted life. (Paul Morphy)
Chess is as elaborate a waste of human intelligence as you can find outside an advertising agency. (Raymond Chandler)
Haaa! Well, that's one way to win, Vulcan. That reminds me of someone I used to play Scrabble with. He tried so often to sneak tiles into his hand that had already been laid to use in his next word. More often than not I spotted him doing it - but I don't doubt there were times when he succeeded. Didn't do him a lot of good though. He rarely won. :o)
I have played chess but wasn't much good at it - no real strategy, just off-the-cuff moves. In an effort to try and improve my game, back in the early 80s, i bought a small electrical chess game with differing levels of difficulty computed into it.
I was beaten by the machine more times than i cared to count - even on the 'beginner' level, but one day i thought my luck had changed when i captured it's queen. However, a few moves later, the machine moved it's queen!!! I had taken it but it had reappeared on the board.
I promptly gave the game away:-/
I was beaten by the machine more times than i cared to count - even on the 'beginner' level, but one day i thought my luck had changed when i captured it's queen. However, a few moves later, the machine moved it's queen!!! I had taken it but it had reappeared on the board.
I promptly gave the game away:-/