ChatterBank2 mins ago
Conspiracies
8 Answers
There are questions on here about the Masons and the Illuminatie, which are attached to huge conspiracy theories. So as a poll how many on here belive in A conspiracy and why.
I my self in all honesty believe that the JFK killing was a conspiracy because of many things but foremost is that Gerald Ford (the man they said couldn't walk and chew gum at the same time) was a member of the Warren Commision who found that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone.
I my self in all honesty believe that the JFK killing was a conspiracy because of many things but foremost is that Gerald Ford (the man they said couldn't walk and chew gum at the same time) was a member of the Warren Commision who found that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone.
Answers
1 to 8 of 8
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Stevee. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Not the totaly prime but the Warren commission has by even none conspiracists some glaring ommisions in eveidence,questions not answered or asked. Ford as we know was a republican seeking elected office he by all accounts made no contribution to the process.
Given that a president was assasinated I have found it curious that members of this commission and in this case a high profile one were conspicuous by thier inaction.
Given that a president was assasinated I have found it curious that members of this commission and in this case a high profile one were conspicuous by thier inaction.
Stevee
I think this would probably deserve a thread of its own, to separate it from your general question about conspiracies, but ponder this if you will in reply to what you have said so far.
The Warren Commission was set up, and the principal appointees nominated, by the new President, Lyndon Johnson. He was a Democrat. Are you suggesting, therefore, that the conspiracy, if there was one, was also across party boundaries? I just find it curious that a self-confessed conspiracist should pick up on this point and say that it is "foremost" among your reasons for suspecting a conspiracy, considering what other "material" is normally trotted out. There must have been one heck of an inducement to keep ALL the Warren Commission workers silent, not just Ford. And keep them silent, to this day.
I would also like to know to what extent you consider the "conspiracy" to have reached. That is, is it a simple case of there being more than one gunman and, by definition, a conspiracy; or a conspiracy to cover up the "conspiracy" between two or more gunmen, because of the sensitive Cuban situation; or do you believe that the "conspiracy" amongst the government, military etc began earlier and that they were involved in the actual assassination plot?
I think this would probably deserve a thread of its own, to separate it from your general question about conspiracies, but ponder this if you will in reply to what you have said so far.
The Warren Commission was set up, and the principal appointees nominated, by the new President, Lyndon Johnson. He was a Democrat. Are you suggesting, therefore, that the conspiracy, if there was one, was also across party boundaries? I just find it curious that a self-confessed conspiracist should pick up on this point and say that it is "foremost" among your reasons for suspecting a conspiracy, considering what other "material" is normally trotted out. There must have been one heck of an inducement to keep ALL the Warren Commission workers silent, not just Ford. And keep them silent, to this day.
I would also like to know to what extent you consider the "conspiracy" to have reached. That is, is it a simple case of there being more than one gunman and, by definition, a conspiracy; or a conspiracy to cover up the "conspiracy" between two or more gunmen, because of the sensitive Cuban situation; or do you believe that the "conspiracy" amongst the government, military etc began earlier and that they were involved in the actual assassination plot?
1 to 8 of 8
