Charles and Camilla

[ianess]

If they'd decided to get married at Gretna Green or even Las Vegas would there still have been all this debate about our "constitution"?   Would it still be legal and does anyone really give a monkey's?

[kempie]

I couldn't care less if Charles Mountbatten Windsor marries Camilla Parker-Bowles but I do object strongly to HRH Prince Charles The Prince of Wales, Duke of Cornwall, Duke of Rothesay, Earl of Carrick, Baron Renfrew, Lord of the Isles, and Prince and Great Steward of Scotland acting as if he is above the law of the land.

He has lived a life of great privilege and with this comes obligation. If he doesn't like doing what's expected of him then let him renounce his titles (and monies) and be free to do as he wishes.

[Ducati]

Very firmly in the 'I couldn't give a monkey's camp'. Am bored mental by the whole lot of it - the only thing that does irritate me is that I have no doubt that in some way shape or form we will be paying for it.

[Hgrove]

Princess Anne re-married in Scotland, with the Queen present, having divorced Capt. Phillips and no-one questioned that so I don't see why Prince Charles can't do that.  Another thing that strikes me as funny:  they are now saying that Princess Margaret had been advised by the then Lord Chancellor that she could not marry Capt. Peter Townshend in a Register Office.  Funny that because I have heard her speech (in recordings - I am too young to remember the original) and she clearly stated that she had been advised she could contract a civil marriage (but chose not to).