Quizzes & Puzzles7 mins ago
Toilet Etiquette
37 Answers
this week a letter was sent to all staff at my company concerning the toilets; the site administrator had to virtually seek legal advice before sending it. it concerns what has been delicately phrased as "inappropriate use", leading to cleaning and damage issues.
in simple terms, this is a case of 1960s style facilities meeting certain etiquettes, and the two being incompatible.
i'm no employment law expert so i ask:- is the company correct in expecting all employees to use the facilities as they currently exist and putting same in writing, or would the correct legal response be to provide multicultural facilities?
in simple terms, this is a case of 1960s style facilities meeting certain etiquettes, and the two being incompatible.
i'm no employment law expert so i ask:- is the company correct in expecting all employees to use the facilities as they currently exist and putting same in writing, or would the correct legal response be to provide multicultural facilities?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by mushroom25. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.You need a few copies of these posters!
http:// www.mir ror.co. uk/news /world- news/si t-dont- squat-t oilet-t raining -599898 7
I have actually seen these signs in use!
http://
I have actually seen these signs in use!
//If it is OK for a service station why not for your Company. //
aiming information or instructions at the public, ie no-one in particular, is one thing. aiming at a particular section of your workforce - with all the undertones of discrimination that may entail - is quite different.
as stated, it took the company more than a week to get the wording of the letter as they wanted.
aiming information or instructions at the public, ie no-one in particular, is one thing. aiming at a particular section of your workforce - with all the undertones of discrimination that may entail - is quite different.
as stated, it took the company more than a week to get the wording of the letter as they wanted.
It was a daily occurrence to find urine on the seats of the 'Ladies' Loos.
I can only assume many women who use the 'hover' method do not have a very good aim. I found 'solids' on the floor of the cubicles in the Ladies on many occasions, but never in the Gents. Other cleaners I talked to agree with me that Ladies Loos were far worse than Gents.
I can only assume many women who use the 'hover' method do not have a very good aim. I found 'solids' on the floor of the cubicles in the Ladies on many occasions, but never in the Gents. Other cleaners I talked to agree with me that Ladies Loos were far worse than Gents.
Are you sure your company was aiming this at people who like to face a different way? Every so often some miscreant smears stuff about or something equally vile where I work and we have to put a carefully worded briefing out - and I can guarantee we don't have any muslim staff (if that's what this is all about).
I recall many years ago when I was Secretary to a Job Evaluation Committee who were establishing 'Bench Mark' jobs and was present when the Committee interviewed a Toilet Attendant at a North Eastern Port . During the course of the interview the T A was asked (a standard question to all) if he worked in Dirty Conditions and he replied along the lines of " Yes, especially when we have a Curry Ship in port.". He then explained that Asiatics are inclined to put their feet on the toilet seat and in a crouched position leave a deposit on the actual seat.
Hans.
Hans.
the only obligation is: that employers provide clean working facilities, one set for women the other for men. the only time a muslim requires to face east (mecca) is when they pray 5 times a day from what i understand this requires foot washing before prayer, responsible employers would provide these seperate from toilets. very often the reason for poor facilities is the workers who abuse them