Yes I agree. ... but its not clear to me what the will said about the property...surely she had a right to it to live in or sell and couldn't be kicked out by the sons???
I do hope she leaves her share to her daughters, all be needed to do was make reasonable provision then the sons could inherit the rest no problem. I do hope this will be a useful precedent.
there's a benefit to the state in not having to support people who've been cut out of millionaire's wills. Though I must say a £1m estate isn't saying much these days; my little flat in London's worth that.
For a long time there has been a provision where someone can challenge a will if they had a reasonable expectation of continued support. They don't normally get half though.
Widows have successfully challenged such Wills before, claiming 'reasonable financial provision' under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975. I don't see that this particular case has set a precedent.
"TTT, you would be surprised at the number of contested / defended Wills involving charities, like this case " - am I the only one who finds that disturbing?