Body & Soul12 mins ago
Britainastan?
39 Answers
If every Muslim in the country moved to the south west of England, declared their own state and called it Britainastan, a Muslim state with law founded on Muslim principles, it then invited Muslims from all over the world to live there and offered state grants to resettle (funded perhaps by the Saudis), that the facts on the ground with local self determination resulted in the U.N recognising this new state.
Would you resist?
If so, at what point, when, would you accept this eventuality?
Would you resist?
If so, at what point, when, would you accept this eventuality?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by 123everton. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.IF the Ottomans resurfaced and took UK we would be obliged to live accordingly. We spilled blood for u/m victory.
http://en.wikipedia.o...Mandate_for_Palestine
http://en.wikipedia.o...Mandate_for_Palestine
I wonder if the answers that are being recorded are based more on the fact that some people dislike Muslims immensely so are disinterested in what happens to them in Palestine, perhaps it is this lack of sympathy that is resulting in this lack of empathy.
Regardless of the likelihood of it happening here, it did happen there, are the Palestinans wrong to be "annoyed" about it?
Are they wrong to resist it?
If they are, would we be wrong to resist such an eventuality here?
Regardless of the likelihood of it happening here, it did happen there, are the Palestinans wrong to be "annoyed" about it?
Are they wrong to resist it?
If they are, would we be wrong to resist such an eventuality here?
It's an interesting concept that I have thought about before.
The christians, buddhists, muslims, hindus, athiests etc. all move to separate areas of the country. This would give them effective control of Local Authorities and City Councils and they could all make local laws to suit their own needs.
It is difficult to see, however, that this self-created ghettoisation of the country would not lead to trouble in the long run.
The christians, buddhists, muslims, hindus, athiests etc. all move to separate areas of the country. This would give them effective control of Local Authorities and City Councils and they could all make local laws to suit their own needs.
It is difficult to see, however, that this self-created ghettoisation of the country would not lead to trouble in the long run.
very interesting indeed. i personally feel its not horible for them to be resisting as much as they do because, as you said, they are only resisting from the things in palestein which happen. anyway, back on the subject, i'm not sure if it would work, there would definately be arguments between the muslims and the other people of the rest of the uk.
No, they are not wrong to be annoyed about it and they are not wrong to resist it. However, the method by which they resist it is wrong, and I think if they approached it in a more intelligent way and by more civilised and dignified means, they would gain far more sympathy from the world at large. Even though they most certainly have a valid grievance, I have to agree with the person on here who said a few days ago that he would rather live under Israeli rule than Palestinian rule - and that is solely due to the mindset their culture encompasses and promotes.
Sorry, I didn't answer your original question. Yes, I would resist it and I would never consider it acceptable. Like many people, I'm on the side of the Palestinians, but I get a bit miffed when they want to blow people to smithereens. It's a pity they don't recognise that not every western infidel is against them. I'm not sure who is their worst enemy - the Israelis or themselves.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.