News1 min ago
The definition of an Athiest
72 Answers
Hi guys can you help please? Waldo if you still come on here would love your take on this.
Am on a site which claims that Athiesm is now a religion and whilst I know this to be not true, Someone such as yourself(anyone else plese post as well!) can put it far more eloguently than me!
Thank you
Am on a site which claims that Athiesm is now a religion and whilst I know this to be not true, Someone such as yourself(anyone else plese post as well!) can put it far more eloguently than me!
Thank you
Answers
To call atheism a religion is merely a sloppy use of the language, as in "Football is a religion to him" or "She embraces astrology with a religious fervour". LeMarchand is guilty of this when talking about Dawkins' rationality.
Religion is an irrational belief in some deity or other. An atheist like me dismisses such beliefs as absurd. Ergo atheism is...
Religion
11:00 Thu 16th Jun 2011
To call atheism a religion is merely a sloppy use of the language, as in "Football is a religion to him" or "She embraces astrology with a religious fervour". LeMarchand is guilty of this when talking about Dawkins' rationality.
Religion is an irrational belief in some deity or other. An atheist like me dismisses such beliefs as absurd. Ergo atheism is the opposite of religionism.
Religion is an irrational belief in some deity or other. An atheist like me dismisses such beliefs as absurd. Ergo atheism is the opposite of religionism.
Religion is no more an irrational or absurd belief than atheism in my opinion.
None of us can be sure. If I did believe in a God, that god might not take the form of anything any religion claims. I wouldn't call it a religion. I just don't know! I don't understand how anybody can be so adamant that they are right.
None of us can be sure. If I did believe in a God, that god might not take the form of anything any religion claims. I wouldn't call it a religion. I just don't know! I don't understand how anybody can be so adamant that they are right.
Atheism is non-belief in a deity.
Since not all religions require a deity, it is possible to have atheistic religions. But "atheism" isn't one of them because atheism isn't a religion.
Simply google "atheistic religions", or start here:
http://atheism.about....p/AtheistReligion.htm
Since not all religions require a deity, it is possible to have atheistic religions. But "atheism" isn't one of them because atheism isn't a religion.
Simply google "atheistic religions", or start here:
http://atheism.about....p/AtheistReligion.htm
Atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities In a narrower sense, atheism is specifically the position that there are no deities. Most inclusively, atheism is simply the absence of belief that any deities exist. Atheism is contrasted with theism, which in its most general form is the belief that at least one deity exists.
The term atheism originated from the Greek ἄθεος (atheos), meaning "without god", which was applied with a negative connotation to those thought to reject the gods worshipped by the larger society
The term atheism originated from the Greek ἄθεος (atheos), meaning "without god", which was applied with a negative connotation to those thought to reject the gods worshipped by the larger society
As a religion is defined as: " a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe, especially when considered as the creation of a superhuman agency or agencies, usually involving devotional and ritual observances, and often containing a moral code governing the conduct of human affairs".
I am not sure how you can say that athiesm is a religion as it does not have any sets of beliefs in fact, it is the opposite.
I am not sure how you can say that athiesm is a religion as it does not have any sets of beliefs in fact, it is the opposite.
I'm an Atheist, because I do not believe in any deity, it certainly is not a religion!
How can someone not believing in something be a religion
So if you don't believe in the flying spaghetti monster, does that mean that you are part of a religion?
Seems a bit crazy to me lol.
Religion is a belief system not a dis-belief system, surely?
How can someone not believing in something be a religion
So if you don't believe in the flying spaghetti monster, does that mean that you are part of a religion?
Seems a bit crazy to me lol.
Religion is a belief system not a dis-belief system, surely?
'Atheism' means 'without god', that is exactly what it is.
Atheists do not believe in the existence of a god, they may believe in other things, like honesty, humanity, compassion and fairness or other less commendable qualities, but it isn't a religion, you need a god for one of those. Some believers are so deeply buried in the dogma of belief that they simply can't comprehend life without it. We have seen some examples posted on this thread.
Atheists do not believe in the existence of a god, they may believe in other things, like honesty, humanity, compassion and fairness or other less commendable qualities, but it isn't a religion, you need a god for one of those. Some believers are so deeply buried in the dogma of belief that they simply can't comprehend life without it. We have seen some examples posted on this thread.
Properly defined 'atheism' denotes a 'lack of belief' - in this case a belief in the existence of a 'god' or 'gods' . . . whatever it is those terms are intended to refer to.
Until a god is defined in terms of that in reality to which 'it' refers, the terms atheist and atheism are rendered virtually as meaningless as the entity to which they are intended to refer. What does it mean to not believe in something that is by definition undefined? Isn't that just a redundant term for 'irrationality'?
Watch out for the invocation of undefined wild cards upon which any further reasonable hope of a rational discussion has ended.
Until a god is defined in terms of that in reality to which 'it' refers, the terms atheist and atheism are rendered virtually as meaningless as the entity to which they are intended to refer. What does it mean to not believe in something that is by definition undefined? Isn't that just a redundant term for 'irrationality'?
Watch out for the invocation of undefined wild cards upon which any further reasonable hope of a rational discussion has ended.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.