Quizzes & Puzzles5 mins ago
Do you think ESP is a reality?
61 Answers
Just a bit of light relief from all the recent dismal warnings of Armageddon. :o)
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by naomi24. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
Yes, I did go somewhere to prepare. I had 'disaster sensing', where if something was badly wrong like my exam results I could tell as soon as I got near the envelope. But little more. When I finally left college after many years of formal study I wanted to study for pleasure, and that was my main interest so joined a psychic development group to see what people could do.
In a few minutes she had me seeing auras and tuning in to all sorts of information and I teach the same to others now in a similar period. I've done tests on simple clairvoyance now for 20 years (which was when this began) and can easily turn out good results time after time and frightened a good many new arrivals who were drawing accurate pictures of something I'd drawn and sealed in another room after I showed them how.
ESP is on many levels, and each is pretty much as hard to get to as the last once you go beyond the easy stuff. In fact the reality bending stuff is so rare few claim it can be done and even fewer demonstrate it to others. I have seen a few people do object materialisation and the like (including two sessions with Uri Geller) and the first guy seemed pretty difficult to be able to cheat, and was investigated formally since with controls and still managed the same thing.
We can all naturally tune in to everything like TV sets and once we get used to it can get better with practice. The higher stuff though remains more a potential goal so far but just enough material for me not to dismiss the big stuff like bilocation and psychokinesis altogether.
In a few minutes she had me seeing auras and tuning in to all sorts of information and I teach the same to others now in a similar period. I've done tests on simple clairvoyance now for 20 years (which was when this began) and can easily turn out good results time after time and frightened a good many new arrivals who were drawing accurate pictures of something I'd drawn and sealed in another room after I showed them how.
ESP is on many levels, and each is pretty much as hard to get to as the last once you go beyond the easy stuff. In fact the reality bending stuff is so rare few claim it can be done and even fewer demonstrate it to others. I have seen a few people do object materialisation and the like (including two sessions with Uri Geller) and the first guy seemed pretty difficult to be able to cheat, and was investigated formally since with controls and still managed the same thing.
We can all naturally tune in to everything like TV sets and once we get used to it can get better with practice. The higher stuff though remains more a potential goal so far but just enough material for me not to dismiss the big stuff like bilocation and psychokinesis altogether.
-- answer removed --
I have had several experiences in my life that defy any explanation in ordinary terms.
One of the early ones was with my sister. After reading a book about paranormal phenomena we conducted an experiment. The book suggested a technique for passing information to another person by concentration on the target image and imagining the receiver was looking over your shoulder while they let their mind go blank.
I wrote a number on a piece of paper and did as suggested then waited for her to get an impression. After a while I asked her if she could see anything to which she replied she couldn't. I then said "no numbers" to which she replied "Oh, the bright orange six." This was what I had written on the paper. It was too much down to suggestion by my mentioning the number but I was encouraged by the expression "bright orange".
So we tried again with an object. It was a tube of leather reconditioner. Without prompting, she correnctly told me the size and that it "has writing on it".
I asked her what colour it was to which she replied "yellow" which was indeed the colour of the tube. At that instant I thought that she should change her impression if I then concentrated on the cap which was brown. Without hesitation she said "no, its brown".
She definitely could not see the object I was looking at. Indeed she probably had never even seen it before. Nobody else was in the room.
If not by ESP then it was a remarkable coincidence.
One of the early ones was with my sister. After reading a book about paranormal phenomena we conducted an experiment. The book suggested a technique for passing information to another person by concentration on the target image and imagining the receiver was looking over your shoulder while they let their mind go blank.
I wrote a number on a piece of paper and did as suggested then waited for her to get an impression. After a while I asked her if she could see anything to which she replied she couldn't. I then said "no numbers" to which she replied "Oh, the bright orange six." This was what I had written on the paper. It was too much down to suggestion by my mentioning the number but I was encouraged by the expression "bright orange".
So we tried again with an object. It was a tube of leather reconditioner. Without prompting, she correnctly told me the size and that it "has writing on it".
I asked her what colour it was to which she replied "yellow" which was indeed the colour of the tube. At that instant I thought that she should change her impression if I then concentrated on the cap which was brown. Without hesitation she said "no, its brown".
She definitely could not see the object I was looking at. Indeed she probably had never even seen it before. Nobody else was in the room.
If not by ESP then it was a remarkable coincidence.
I seemed to be particularly sensitive to bad stuff naturally, and turned out my father and mother's brother could do the same thing after I mentioned it. But whatever tendencies we have can be expanded by working on them. I did tests with cards and two people not only regularly got the right colour but actual cards. Not the odd one but nearly every time.
Telepathy and clairvoyance, what's happening elsewhere in the present or information about the past can easily be explained as normal transmissions on a frequency without limited distance, it's the big stuff like seeing through walls or levitation which beats science altogether. But the few teachers who claim it's possible usually tell the students not to do it in public as it's taking advantage of people by showing off. Uri Geller didn't have a teacher so if he's real is free do make millions if he wants to. I can only confirm clairvoyance and telepathy as I've been testing people and doing it myself for 20 years, but of course if some things are possible and science can't see how, others may well be as well.
Telepathy and clairvoyance, what's happening elsewhere in the present or information about the past can easily be explained as normal transmissions on a frequency without limited distance, it's the big stuff like seeing through walls or levitation which beats science altogether. But the few teachers who claim it's possible usually tell the students not to do it in public as it's taking advantage of people by showing off. Uri Geller didn't have a teacher so if he's real is free do make millions if he wants to. I can only confirm clairvoyance and telepathy as I've been testing people and doing it myself for 20 years, but of course if some things are possible and science can't see how, others may well be as well.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.