ChatterBank3 mins ago
The best lack all conviction, while the worst are full of passionate intensity.
160 Answers
While I'm not suggesting that the AB atheists are the worst, this line might explain why the atheist v theist debate seems so one sided.
Agree?
Agree?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by sandyRoe. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.There is in principle an advantage to believing only to the extent that those beliefs reflect reality. Beyond the domain of correlation between the facts and what one believes them to be, there is no virtue in believing for belief's sake. Refusing to be constrained by an improved understanding is seeking escape from the terror of the unknown through the refusal to acknowledge ones own ignorance.
Passion serves us well only to the extent that it is tempered by an acknowledgement of our ignorance and directed toward the pursuit of an improved understanding based on knowledge which is its only justification. Passion, like belief, is not an end in itself but a means to an end best foreseen, through an understanding of that which drives it based on a knowledge of what justifies it.
There is no reason for anything, neither apart from nor beyond reason. Reason . . . it’s why we are here.
Passion serves us well only to the extent that it is tempered by an acknowledgement of our ignorance and directed toward the pursuit of an improved understanding based on knowledge which is its only justification. Passion, like belief, is not an end in itself but a means to an end best foreseen, through an understanding of that which drives it based on a knowledge of what justifies it.
There is no reason for anything, neither apart from nor beyond reason. Reason . . . it’s why we are here.
//But is reason a good reason to be here ?//
You know of a better one? Feel free to speculate.
//I have no problem with favoured hypotheses.//
In whose favour? . . . as if anyone needed to ask.
//How dull to only believe that which is proven beyond reasonable doubt.//
We could all benefit from a little more knowledge. But in the context of what little I know, there is little room for disinterest.
You know of a better one? Feel free to speculate.
//I have no problem with favoured hypotheses.//
In whose favour? . . . as if anyone needed to ask.
//How dull to only believe that which is proven beyond reasonable doubt.//
We could all benefit from a little more knowledge. But in the context of what little I know, there is little room for disinterest.
If as seems likely believers failed to develop their critical faculties at a crucial stage of their development it is unlikely that they will develop as they reach maturity. They are therefore at a disadvantage when it comes to arguing their case and are doomed to failure for this reason alone apart from being wrong too. Why does god only recruit foot soldiers and not generals?