@ Khandro
If you agree with Jake that Hitlers religiosity was irrelevant, why did you introduce it into the conversation in the first place?
"In Germany, since Bismark, the church and the state have been completely separated. Hitler and Mussolini were both irreligious, (elsewhere Stalin and Franco too), so perhaps it's the atheist leaders we should beware of, (Winston Churchill was a Christian)"
This is your post, and the inference is clear - that atheism is, in your opinion, dangerous.Otherwise, why bother to introduce it at all? Now you backpeddle and obfuscate.
Re Hitlers religiosity - It matters little what you stubbornly believe - factually speaking, the balance of evidence supports Hitler as someone who was definitely not atheist.It is clear from his actions, from recollections of conversations with his peers, and from his writings that he had some sort of faith, although probably not an orthodox one.
You still have yet to comment on your misrepresentation of the quote from the Dawkins conversation with Hitchens. Why?