@Locusts
Sorry, but this last answer of yours was just a jumble that makes little sense.
"and Bible vs. and your thoughts. yes as a fellow Christian I do believe in god s word ,.And there are so many skeptics or or nonbelievers in the world today it reminds me of the days of the flood . They took no noted of the calamity . The problem with the human race they think in human terms and not in the spiritual sense as you might agree the Bible is the authority ,and a quotation from revelation kjv 11 18.19 is the end of the world. And gods time Is not the same 24-hour time or years we think of. For one day is a thousand years to god. So time would be longer to you and me."
1. You claim the bible as being spiritual authority, and claim that humans and sceptics pay too much attention to the temporal, empirical world around us. Unyet you then blather on about "humanity taking no notice of the calamity", in reference to the flood. You cannot have it both ways. Either its a spiritual, interpretative guide or an authorative literal record.
There is little proof of a global flood, as described in the bible. Lots of evidence to suggest that many cultures, prior to the bible, experienced severe local flooding, but nothing to suggest it was global- Its a narrative without foundation.
No evidence to support the end days narrative either - JWs have asserted we are entering the end times on several occasions over the decades, and have been proved wrong each time. We had Mr. Camping predicting the apocalypse just last year and again it was shown to be incorrect. We had he conspiracy enthusiasts predicting global cataclysm this December which came to nothing.
These are not the end times. Indeed, things are generally getting better for humanity as a whole, with better longevity and reduced child mortality figures.
The bible is not an authority for anything. Its a mish- mash of myth and legend, heavily edited by political authorities. It might contain some trivial folk wisdom, and some of the stories can be full of action, but thats about it.
And then you bring "gods time" into it. With reference to what? Just for the duration of creation, or everafter? Even if each day was a thousand years, the creation took considerably longer than 7000 years!
More logic less faith required when making points, i think.....