"It is laughable to hear because we have no proof of multiple universes they cannot possible exist.
The Higgs Boson is a sub-atomic elementary particle, not a sailor. It is Boson, not Bosun. The above statement is what is laughable. No one here has ever said that multiple universes cannot exist - just that they are conjecture with scant to no evidence to support them. Given that, it would be laughable to construct a theory, first for the existence of multiple universes simply to explain what is a very unlikely proposition - that of a creator god. That would be a joke theory, with no foundation in reality at all.
"Only last year we couldn't accept the existance of the Higgs Bosun because no proof had been found. We now know differently! "
Who was it that could not accept the existence of the Higgs Boson? You might not have been able to accept it, but certainly the majority of theoretical physicists did.
"The existance of a multiple universes is no different than the search for the Higgs Bosun.. it depends on how much effort we want to put into it. Even if they were located doesn't mean the existance of a god but it does give it more credence."
How would the finding that there were multiple universes give the existence of god more credence? Where is your reasoning and what is your logic for that statement?
"So the main argument against creation is a creator couldn't exist within our universe as we live in a 4 dimensional sphere with time always proceding in a positive direction. "
No, this is not the main argument - it is one of many, and that is the reason why most scientists think that a god - certainly a god as described by the main religions - is very, very unlikely.
"If it were proved that there existing other universes than our own these laws may not hold. "
True.
"To this day no proof has been found but only conjecture."
Also True.
" Many physicists prefer not to enter this arena for fear of being branded religious nutters and losing their funding."
Untrue.
" However with the use of string theory and quantum mechanics this area is taken up by some. "
Untrue. String Theory and quantum mechanics does not make a god more likely, but such esoteric theories are often cited and used by those who wish to make a case for a deity - without necessarily understanding the concepts.
"This article expounds our theories on this matter and will surely get more acceptance in future.
http://physics.about.com/od/astronomy/f/multipleuniverses.htm "
It makes an overview of some of the thinking around thes issues. Why do you assume that these theories will gain greater acceptance in the future? What is your reasoning behind that statement? Just because such issues are popular in fiction and in dinner table discussions does not make them any more likely to be accepted in the future. Evidence might, but first you have to design the experiment and collect the data....