There is an interesting discussion on Noah's Ark in today Guardian. As an educated person and a rationalist, I can't see how the Ark could possibly have been big enough to get one animal of each species on board, let alone two. Presumably dionsaurs would also have been included.
Are there any Christian ABer's, preferably British ones, not Americans, that can help explain it please ? No cut and pasting from the Bible please...just facts will do !
When you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.
It's impossible to flood the entire world, there isn't enough water, so, improbable as it might seem to some, only Noah's world was flooded.
sandy //I think my explanation, that all the animals were never actually on an Ark, seems much more logical. //
But sandy we are not talking about logic, we are talking about the bible .
modeller //Each animal requires many times its body weight in food and water over a period of a year, but just as important what goes in must also come out.//
Indeed . There were not enough humans on board to distribute the food to such numbers of animals let alone shovel out the sh1t.
If all animals on the planet had descended from a single pair just six thousand years ago we would see very little diversity in their genomes. Once again, observation debunks the religious dogma.